Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)" Results 8681 - 8700 of 21,115
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2017, 8:30 am by Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A.
Reading the statute, under Florida law, a dog bite plaintiff need not prove the defendants knowledge of the dog’s dangerousness. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 7:56 am by Robert Kraft
In some very narrow circumstances, a single-person LLC or corporation may be considered an individual’s “alter ego” in the opinion of the court and because only the person litigating the case pro se stands to endure harm, they can be granted leave to prosecute or defend a case on their own. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 5:07 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
In a recent case from the Georgia Supreme Court, a plaintiff was injured when she was bitten by defendants dog. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 9:20 am by Altman & Altman
The defendant failed to exercise that duty of care: If a driver is injured when his airbag explodes for no reason, sending metal debris into the air, the airbag manufacturer may be liable. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 9:18 am by Burton A. Padove
Thus, the court reversed the trial court’s earlier denial of summary judgment favoring the city. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 9:07 am by Neumann Law Group
Thus, the trial court did not err in granting this defendants motion for summary disposition. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 7:35 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
The defendants moved for summary judgment, arguing that the plaintiff’s husband’s own negligence prevented the lawsuit from moving forward. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 7:35 am
In Roederer, the defendant sold Spanish sparkling wine under the name CRISTALINO, infringing the claimant’s rights in its CRISTAL brand of champagne. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 6:44 pm by Carabin & Shaw, P.C.
The City argued that the officer was entitled to official immunity and wasn’t personally liable to the plaintiff, such that the City’s governmental immunity should be waived. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 3:46 pm by John C. Manoog III
However, there are a few limited circumstances under which a third party may be liable in tort for the employee’s injuries. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 12:01 pm by Jordan Brunner
Whenever NSA hackers cut the attackers’ link between their command and control server and the malware, the Russians would simply set up a new one, which amounted to “a new level of interaction between a cyber attacker and a defender. [read post]
However, under the last clear chance doctrine, the defendant may be liable if they were able to avoid the accident but failed to do so. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 10:13 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” However, “there was no reason for defendant to do research about whether individual letter recipients were purchasing products covered by the patent, because the purpose of the letter was to inform recipients of defendants rights under the patent and to try to win their business. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
The plaintiff filed a products liability suit alleging, among other things, that the defendant was liable for design defects based on strict liability and negligence. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 6:49 am by Stephen D. Rosenberg
For a defendant, this kind of detailed special questions can often be very helpful, because typically a jury can end the case in the defendants favor at any of several decision points in the series of questions; for a plaintiff, they are often disadvantageous, because in most cases a jury will have to find in the plaintiff’s favor on each question in succession to find a defendant liable. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 2:51 am by Thomas Musmann
Eli Lilly argued in this respect that the ‘promise utility doctrine’ was a radical departure from Canada’s traditional utility standard and the utility standards applied by Canada’s NAFTA partners, the US and Mexico. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 3:00 pm by Steve Lubet
The individuals serving on the boards of these organizations may be liable for damages. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 2:22 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Graco Children’s Products,Inc., 429 F.3d 1043 (Fed. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 2:20 pm by Paul Pfeifer
The defendant admitted that he was at fault for causing the accident but claimed that he was not liable for the plaintiff’s injuries. [read post]