Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 8681 - 8700
of 13,843
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2019, 9:58 pm
United States, 98 Fed. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am
United States, 13-1487, voluntarily turned over to the FBI fifteen firearms while unrelated marijuana charges were pending against him. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
That led to fireworks on the floor of the United States Senate in 2005. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 10:32 am
The United States ratified the Hague Convention in 1988, and the Convention was implemented by the International Child Abduction Remedies Act (ICARA), 42 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 5:57 am
And the list that the Direct Marketing Association (DMA) was hoping to end up on didn’t belong to Santa but to SCOTUS (Supreme Court of the United States). [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am
Black, 538 U.S. 343 (2003) (upholding criminal punishment for true threats); United States v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 10:31 am
A 2008 report from Human Rights Watch said that there are 2,484 youth offenders serving life without parole in the United States, with Florida, California, Louisiana, Michigan and Pennsylvania having the highest number. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 10:15 am
United States 21-1576Issue: Whether the proper remedy for the government’s failure to prove venue is an acquittal barring re-prosecution of the offense, as the U.S. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 5:38 am
Bank v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 12:42 pm
Miller, United States District Court Judge for the Southern District of California, ruled that Tilikum. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 6:29 am
Federal Election Commission, in which a federal district court upheld a federal ban on campaign contributions by foreigners, as limiting the scope of Citizens United v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 5:20 am
My article is forthcoming next year in the Southern California Law Review. [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 12:21 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm
United States, 17-778, United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 11:59 am
The case is Friedrichs v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 9:36 am
The September 2 order of the United States District Court for the Central District of California is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit with instructions to remand to the District Court for further consideration in light of Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 7:33 am
In California, contract principles determine who has standing—the eligibility to make a claim or sue an insurer—to recover benefits due under the policy or for a “bad faith” withholding of policy benefits, as stated in Seretti v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
That is why the Supreme Court’s failure to make clear the standard of review it was applying in United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 9:14 am
" (8) United States v. [read post]
11 May 2017, 8:48 am
The outcomeAylus Networks, Inc. appeals the United States District Court for the Northern District of California’s grant of summary judgment finding that Apple Inc. [read post]
