Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B." Results 8681 - 8700 of 15,310
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2013, 9:09 am by J
Ltd v Kintex Shareholding Company [2004] EWHC 1599 (Comm), per Cooke J at [7];(b) s.81 can be satisfied by court determination, or Tribunal decision or arbitration. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 2:32 pm by John Elwood
§ 1225(b)(2)(C); (2) whether MPP is consistent with any applicable and enforceable non-refoulement obligations; (3) whether MPP is exempt from the Administrative Procedure Act requirement of notice-and-comment rulemaking; and (4) whether the district court’s universal preliminary injunction is impermissibly overbroad. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
S. 148, 165 (2008), but “[c]oncerns with the judicial creation of a private cause of action caution against its expansion,” ibid. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 5:55 am
Milkborne disease outbreaks by Food category, United States, 1973-2005 (source: FTCLDF via CDC). [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 6:56 am
 Bearing this in mind, Joshy notes, today -- buried deep within the Deregulation Bill 2014 -- is the following provision (effective two months from the Act’s commencement date)Blocking: if only it wereas easy as A, B, C ... [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 10:24 am
Horan issued a November 5, 2009 Opinion and Order in the post-Koken case of Baptiste v. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 9:28 am by John Floyd
This was evidenced in the January 21, 2016 decision by the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 4:56 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cargill gives specific examples of HIS -->[0029]Non-limiting examples of HIS suitable for embodiments of the present invention include rebaudioside A, rebaudioside B, rebauclioside C, rebauclioside D, rebaudioside E, rebaudioside F, dulcoside A, dulcoside B, rubusoside, stevia, stevioside, mogroside IV, and mogroside V, Luo Han Guo sweetener, siamenoside, monatin and its salts (monatin SS, RR, RS, SR), curculin, glycyrrhizic acid and its salts, thaumatin,… [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 7:34 am
; and (b) what is the predominant purpose of the device used to circumvent the TPM? [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm by David Smith
This was well-summarised by the Court in the following terms: (i) a claim for possession of land is the modern equivalent of a claim for ejectment (see the discussion in Secretary of State for the Environment v Meier [2009] UKSC 11; [2009] 1 WLR 2780, paragraphs 6-7, 26-33, and 59-61); (ii) a claim for ejectment (as opposed to a claim for an injunction in trespass) could only be maintained by someone who could establish a legal estate in the land (see e.g. per Lord Mansfield CJ,… [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm by David Smith
This was well-summarised by the Court in the following terms: (i) a claim for possession of land is the modern equivalent of a claim for ejectment (see the discussion in Secretary of State for the Environment v Meier [2009] UKSC 11; [2009] 1 WLR 2780, paragraphs 6-7, 26-33, and 59-61); (ii) a claim for ejectment (as opposed to a claim for an injunction in trespass) could only be maintained by someone who could establish a legal estate in the land (see e.g. per Lord Mansfield CJ,… [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 7:35 am by David Post
[For a summary of the many studies in this area, see the Scholars' Amicus Brief in Vasquez v. [read post]