Search for: "State v. Liberty" Results 8681 - 8700 of 9,942
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2024, 5:50 am by Mary B. McCord
This sort of coordinated intimidation is poisonous for America’s democracy, making it less likely that everyday Americans will feel secure in asserting their fundamental rights to liberty and self-government. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:49 pm
Moreover, in contrast to states like Arizona, which require employers within their states to use the federal government’s E-Verify pilot program to verify their employees’ work eligibility, in 2007 Illinois sought to prohibit use of E-Verify within the state until concerns about the accuracy, effectiveness, and privacy of the new federal database system could be resolved. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 2:22 pm by Howard Knopf
However, for readers convenience, I take the liberty of including the following key quotes from Justice Abella’s judgment (with highlight ad [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 7:23 am by Ronald Collins
Question: Based on your extensive research, do you think that Bob Woodward and Scott Armstrong’s major take-away points (beyond United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 6:26 am
The rapid speed at which AI capabilities are advancing compels the United States to lead in this moment for the sake of our security, economy, and society. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 9:03 pm by Joshua Burd
In a statement, the American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California stated that the curfews violated the U.S. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 9:05 pm
Two notable gems are Maqbool Fida Hussain v Raj Kumar Pandey, 2008 (6) Del. 533 (decrying misuse of obcenity prosecutions) Ju [read post]
19 Nov 2024, 11:15 am by David Greene
.* Marjorie Heins is a writer, former civil rights/civil liberties attorney, and past director of the Free Expression Policy Project (FEPP) and the American Civil Liberties Union's Arts Censorship Project. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 3:34 am by Ben
However, recordings released before 1972 are protected by state-level rather than federal copyright law, so digital services argued that that royalty obligation didn't apply to pre-1972 tracks. [read post]