Search for: "State v. Powers"
Results 8681 - 8700
of 36,866
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2008, 11:31 pm
The Electronic Frontier Foundation, which is leading the Hepting v AT&T case, is asking the appeals court to simply toss the case. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 2:14 pm
And so the Fifth Circuit struck the GFSZA down.The Fifth Circuit’s opinion was subsequently vindicated by the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 1:54 pm
This summer, the United States Supreme Court handed down a decision in the case of Executive Benefits Insurance Agency v. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 5:29 pm
And we all know how much the Bush Administration loves their executive power. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 6:39 pm
Bellas v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 10:59 am
San Francisco Tomorrow, et al. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 10:15 am
” The Circuit Court appears to acknowledge the power of Courts to remove firearms as part of a state action but finds that a civil action seeking protection from domestic violence does not qualify as state action, per se. [read post]
21 Sep 2013, 2:49 pm
This is not to suggest the odd formalism of Lochner v. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm
The Court held that Article III of the Constitution granted federal courts the power to hear disputes between private citizens and states. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 8:34 am
In a 6-3 decision, the justices overruled the 1984 Chevron v. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 10:40 am
State. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 9:17 am
" United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 5:05 am
Earlier this year, the United States Supreme Court decided Hall Street Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2012, 2:43 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States began its October 2012 term last week. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 10:38 am
In Red Bird Egg Farms, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 11:08 am
The case -- Altria Group, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 7:17 pm
US v Cotterman, March 30, 2011. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 2:25 pm
The Court recalled its classic case law according to which Article 308 EC may be used as the legal basis for a measure only where no other provision of the EC Treaty gives the EU institutions the necessary power to adopt it (Case C-84/94 United Kingdom v Council [1996] ECR I-5755, paragraph 48 (working time directive case); Case C-22/96 Parliament v Council [1998] ECR I-3231, paragraph 22; and Case C-436/03 Parliament v Council [2006] ECR I-3733, paragraph 36. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
While the Supreme Court has not retreated from the core holding in Ferber, it has made shutting down the marketplace more difficult with its child pornography holdings in a series of cases, including United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 4:11 am
In a partial victory for California workers, the State’s highest court ruled, in Salas v. [read post]
