Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Laws"
Results 8681 - 8700
of 55,073
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2012, 3:37 am
The big arguments in criminal law come tomorrow, in Dorsey v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 7:51 am
I'll keep you posted on the lawyer v. law school arguments in the coming weeks. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 1:45 pm
Under Pennsylvania law, a third person (Mr. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 6:30 am
The case is People v. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 8:56 am
News articles have reported lavish sums being sought by Miss Goodman which appear out of kilter with what many people would deem reasonable. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 2:40 am
China The Fei Chang Dao blog has an article setting out the number of people who have been punished for political religious speech in China between 1998 and 2020. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 6:41 am
Nest Labs, with its Nest Learning Thermostat, has generated consumer and critical enthusiasm around the home thermostat—a device that most people had long since written off as a bland, dumb appliance. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 12:04 pm
McClatchy Professor of Law, is regarded as one of the nation’s top experts on election law. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 5:05 am
This accident was more than a story of car v. biker, it became bikers v. government, bikers v. not enough safe places to ride, and now, bikers v. criminal justice system. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm
Team Members: Michael Chiaramonte (2L), Vittoria Fiorenza (2L), Hanna Shoshany (3L), Victoria Wagnerman (2L) The competition involved a criminal case of People v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 6:01 am
REASONS FOR THE JUDGMENT The elements of the defence of fair comment had been set out by Lord Nicholls in the Hong Kong case of Tse Wai Chun Paul v Albert Cheng [2001] EMLR 777. [read post]
27 May 2011, 10:31 pm
He was also awarded the 2010 “Trial Star Award” by the Consumer Attorneys of San Diego for his trial work on the case of Rogers v. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 1:45 pm
In other words, can the state create a property interest that will allow it to prosecute people for wearing the wrong sort of T-shirts? [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 3:00 pm
But that is true of many other kinds of federal laws. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 9:30 am
Mocsary (United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit) have posted ‘This Right is Not Allowed by Governments that are Afraid of the People’: The Public Meaning of the Second Amendment When the Fourteenth Amendment Was Ratified (George Mason Law Review, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 823-862, 2010) on SSRN. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 3:49 am
Briefly: In an op-ed for The National Law Journal (subscription or registration required), Rick Hasen suggests that a “special jurisdictional provision” in the McCain-Feingold campaign-finance law “makes it much more likely that within the next few years the Supreme Court will strike limits on the amounts people and entities can contribute to the political parties in so-called party soft money. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 9:37 am
There is justice, grounded in the hearts of the jurors as the collective conscience of the people, central to the jury's function of judging the whole case.Professor Nesson goes on to demonstrate this concept by examining Commonwealth v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 11:04 am
The defendant submits a Memorandum of Law in support of the defendant¹s motion. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 10:36 am
Court of Appeals in Clark v. [read post]
