Search for: "Cross v. State"
Results 8701 - 8720
of 16,708
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2014, 4:27 pm
In People v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 4:27 pm
In People v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 12:11 pm
The question is when do you cross the line? [read post]
Bond v. United States: SCOTUS Interprets Criminal Statute Narrowly to Preserve Federal-State Balance
3 Jun 2014, 9:23 am
” Stenberg v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 12:05 pm
(Cross-posted from Diane Marie Amann)Filed under: IntLawGrrls [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 11:18 am
Replacements (Forbes Cross-Post) Another Spam Litigation Factory Unravels –- Beyond Systems v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 8:03 am
For the reasons stated in this opinion, we agree with the plaintiff and, accordingly, reverse the judgment of the trial court. [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
After the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the United States he contributed $2 million of his personal funds to the American Red Cross Disaster Relief Fund. [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 7:45 am
’ Yet, as the trial court found, ‘[o]n cross examination Dr. [read post]
30 May 2014, 7:43 pm
In 2002, in Atkins v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 8:01 am
Thus, the court could not rule as a matter of law that the cross-petitioner was the decedent’s spouse. [read post]
30 May 2014, 6:00 am
During “Public Private Partnerships: Smooth Sailing or Choppy Waters in the Wake of the Elizabeth River Crossings and VDOT v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 1:10 pm
On May 27, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in State of Ohio v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 4:36 pm
The defendant further stated that the judge had a personal dislike for the defendant’s counsel which he demonstrated with the aid of the People v Oberoi in which the defense counsel appeared in front of the judge to conduct a pre-trial suppression hearing. [read post]
28 May 2014, 1:28 pm
But take your lumps and admit that what transpired should not have occurred.Because only then will you have a chance of getting paragraphs like this one from Judge Kozinski:"After oral argument before us, the United States Attorney 'concede[d] that [the] cross-examination of defendant was error' and advised us that she 'has instituted—in addition to existing training—a semi-monthly training update for the Criminal Division regarding pre-trial… [read post]
28 May 2014, 12:08 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 11:20 am
The EPA’s stated reason for amending the petroleum refinery emission standards was to address the risk remaining after application of the standards promulgated in 1995 and 2002. [read post]
28 May 2014, 7:41 am
Cross-posted on the Law Theories blog. [read post]
27 May 2014, 4:58 pm
Mark Martins, had this to say on the eve of a pre-trial motions hearing in United States v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 3:07 pm
Judge Karen V. [read post]
