Search for: "Short v. United States" Results 8701 - 8720 of 10,137
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2011, 2:06 pm by Paul A. Prados
Constitution allowing Congress "to make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States . . . [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 9:12 pm by Andrew Raff
United States and United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 4:23 pm
” On the other side of the balance, the judge noted the government’s interest in detaining those who “actually pose an immediate threat to the national security of the United States during ongoing international conflict” and ensuring [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 3:36 pm by D. Daxton White
Look at Apple, Apple has a huge market share in the United States where are they going to grow, they want to grow by capturing the middle class that’s coming out in China right now and selling them iPhones. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 3:47 pm
Cir. 1996) ("The nonobviousness of the accused device, evidenced by the grant of a United States patent, is relevant to the issue of whether the change therein is substantial. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 1:19 pm by ligitsec
” Working directly from the purloined manuscript, an editor of The Nation produced a short piece entitled “The Ford Memoirs—Behind the Nixon Pardon. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Holder, which advanced the false assertion that voters of color are no longer subject to systematic efforts to suppress their votes; Citizens United v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 3:26 am by SHG
A little while back, I was considering whether to undertake an empirical study into whether law enforcement officers were relying on the inventory-search exception to the warrant requirement more often after the United States Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in Arizona v. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Hogan (invalidating same-sex admissions policy), considered her vote in United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 1:47 pm
The United States...has responsibility, through...the federal banking agencies, for ensuring that entities providing services to publicly traded companies are not subject to inappropriate secondary liability. [read post]
20 May 2007, 8:56 am
Our explanation of the New Deal transformation is that the public kept reelecting Franklin Roosevelt to the White House and Democrats to the Senate, so that Roosevelt was able to replace eight Justices by the time the Court decided United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 1:34 pm by Mark Walsh
Roberts opens the session with the traditional script: “I have the honor to announce, on behalf of the court, that the October 2017 term of the Supreme Court of the United States is now closed, and the October 2018 term is now convened. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 7:13 am by emagraken
The BC Court of Appeal addressed this issue in reasons for judgement released this week (Steinebach v. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 9:30 am by Jonathan H. Adler
United States is more satisfying than the majority on several counts. [read post]