Search for: "State v. Bodi" Results 8701 - 8720 of 14,870
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2013, 10:03 am by Benjamin Wittes
Germany, Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom and Kennedy v. the United Kingdom. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 11:37 am by Kirk Jenkins
The County of Kendall, No. 116303 – Issue Presented: Is the State’s Attorney’s Office a “public body” subject to the Illinois Freedom of Information Act? [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 7:45 pm by Milena Sterio
  UNCLOS defines the high seas as any body of water beyond the 12-nautical-mile territorial sea of the coastal states; thus, waters that constitute the Russian EEZ actually qualify as the “high seas” for the purposes of piracy law. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 12:55 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
The EEOC’s regulations state that while body weight within a “normal” range is not generally considered an impairment, body weight that falls outside a normal range, whether above or below, or body weight that is the result of a physiological disorder, can be an impairment under the law. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 6:30 am
Benefits available to State employees and employees of a political subdivision of the State ordered to military service §§242 and 243 of New York State’s Military Law Ronald Miller, Esq., in an item posted in CCH’s Blog Employment Law Daily,* reports that a “city was denied summary judgment against an employee’s claim that it refused to reemploy her as a building custodian following her return from active duty with the National Guard… [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 9:53 pm
In fact, the case was one I previously blogged about, involving the death of a woman who used an inflatable slide marketed by Toys R Us, Aleo v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 1:12 pm by Carl Esbeck
Chambers, the Town’s main brief states that the purpose of legislative prayer is “[t]o invoke Divine guidance on a public body entrusted with making the laws. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 10:42 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Employment Opinions Body: AC34560 - Judicial Employees Local 749, AFSCME, AFL-CIO v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
CPLR Article 78 expresses a preference that state courts, rather than federal courts, decide a federal litigant’s “state-law statutory-construction” claim Carver v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 2:56 am by Peter Mahler
Have the courts been able to reconcile the conflicting interests at stake in the two bodies of law governing standing in derivative actions and mergers? [read post]