Search for: "State v. Burden" Results 8701 - 8720 of 22,262
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2023, 10:02 am
This is significant in two broad sets of cases: those that rely on history to apply a constitutional rule (as lower courts are doing with the historical-analogical test prescribed by New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 4:51 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Significantly, the letter of termination sent to Taylor failed to state that intoxication was the reason for his dismissal. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
This is significant in two broad sets of cases: those that rely on history to apply a constitutional rule (as lower courts are doing with the historical-analogical test prescribed by New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 3:22 pm
Petitioner's application for performance of duty disability retirement benefits was denied by respondent New York State and Local Police and Fire Retirement System on the ground that petitioner was not permanently incapacitated from the performance of his duties. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 5:03 am by Public Employment Law Press
A member of the New York State Employees' Retirement System applying for accidental disability retirement benefits has the burden of establishing that the injury he sustained during the incident giving rise to the disability in question was the result of an accident within the meaning of the Retirement and Social Security Law. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 5:03 am by Public Employment Law Press
A member of the New York State Employees' Retirement System applying for accidental disability retirement benefits has the burden of establishing that the injury he sustained during the incident giving rise to the disability in question was the result of an accident within the meaning of the Retirement and Social Security Law. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 3:46 pm
The petitioners also place reliance upon a report by Special Referee Tripp in Matter of Leahy v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 5:41 am by Daniel E. Cummins
March 15, 2010 Nealon, J.)In the case of Florimonte v. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 11:03 am
This law blatantly violated Supreme Court doctrine, which states that abortion restrictions require life and health exceptions, and that prior to viability, states cannot impose an "undue burden" on a woman's right to terminate her pregnancy. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 7:55 pm
"To summarize: New York courts have directed "name-clearing hearings" for probationary employees and for employee without tenure who have been "stigmatized" as a result of “State action” and the employer has made such "stigmatizing" information public.What have the courts considered to be stigmatizing? [read post]