Search for: "United States v. District Court" Results 8701 - 8720 of 34,743
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2013, 7:24 am by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 12:14 pm by Patricia Salkin
Lastly, Counts V, VI, and VII were all found ripe because they alleged state law violations or sought injunctive relief based on the enactment of the three ordinances. [read post]
25 Dec 2007, 6:00 am
The appeals court agreed with SNPC and Itoua that the commercial activity abroad did not have direct effect in the United States. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 5:15 pm by David Oscar Markus
United States, 447 U.S. 649 (1980); United States v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 10:05 am by Susan Brenner
  Specifically, it states that a “court of the United States”, i.e., a federal court, “shall have power to punish by fine or imprisonment, or both, at its discretion, such contempt of its authority, and none other, as . . . [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 1:39 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
United States, 563 U.S. 478, 484–85 (2011) (distinguishing case involving “purely evidentiary dispute” over state-secret privilege, where “the privileged information is excluded and the trial goes on without it,” from case involving foreclosure of a claim). [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 10:11 am
The Colorado District Court then agreed with the Third Circuit's ruling in United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 8:37 pm
Earlier today, October 21, 2008, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a decision in Abbott Laboratories v. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 8:37 pm
Earlier today, October 21, 2008, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a decision in Abbott Laboratories v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 6:13 pm by Josh Blackman
Generally, the only route of appeal from a state court of last resort is to the United States Supreme Court through certiorari. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 3:03 pm by Stephen Korniczky
Today, the Federal Circuit upheld the District Court’s inequitable conduct verdict based on the submission of false affidavits to the United States Patent & Trademark Office (“PTO”). [read post]