Search for: "In re R. F."
Results 8721 - 8740
of 10,011
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2011, 10:23 am
Aditya Bandopadhyay, has examined the relevant provisions of the Right to Information Act while deciding a matter relating to the denial of right of right of inspection and re-evaluation of question papers by the Central Board of Secondary Education. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
Dallas Court of Appeals addresses complex issues in appeal from summary judgment in suit by tort clients who sued their lawyers for barratry CARL "STACEY" NEESE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF L.N., C.N., L.N., AND C.N., JAMES NEESE, DAVID NEESE, JENNIFER HUGHES, MITZI RENFROE, AND IRL HOOPER, Appellants, v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 7:31 am
In Re: Ethicon, Inc. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm
(Reexamination Alert) Recapture doctrine before the CAFC: In re Mostafazedeh (Patents Post-Grant) US Patents – Decisions District Court S D New York: Patentee’s ‘sufficiently plausible’ belief as to the scope of patents negates intent to deceive necessary for false marking claim: Max Impact v Sherwood Group (Docket Report) District Court E D Texas – Marshall jury verdict for plaintiff; invalidity rejected even under ‘preponderance’ standard: Alexsam… [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 2:00 am
: TTAB says STEAM N’ MASH merely descriptive of process potatoes: In re ProMark Brands Inc (not precedential) (TTABlog) WYHA? [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 3:20 pm
Lo responds that he could see a 13-F filing for short positions, but not necessarily one that would be made public. 11:37 am: Rep. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 3:06 am
give great weight to the parties’ objective manifestations of their intent in the written language of their agreement’” and requiring that, “‘[i]f a contract’s meaning is plain and unambiguous, it will be given effect’” (quoting In re BP, Inc. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 8:22 pm
We don’t get Fall Break this year so I’m not sure when I’ll be able to turn everything around, but I’m hoping now that we’re through appropriations season in SBA I’ll be able to catch up. [read post]
31 Jul 2021, 11:02 am
But especially where, as here, a tax committee requests tax information pursuant to section 6103(f )(1) and has invoked facially valid reasons for its request (despite the statute's not requiring any), the Executive Branch should conclude that the request lacks a legitimate legislative objective only in exceptional circumstances. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 2:32 pm
You’re going to figure that the two of them need to resolve their differences first, and that you should stay out. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 3:30 am
., 444 F.3d 158, 161 (2d Cir. 2006)). [read post]
28 Jan 2018, 9:01 pm
In Re Attorney General of the United States. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm
Reeves, 524 F.3d 1161, 1165 (10th Cir. 2008).Contrary to the above quote from the Tenth Circuit, however, “the location of … the arresting agents” certainly can determine “whether an arrest occurs within a home. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 7:21 am
Yet congressional legislation could invalidate their legitimate legal claims (and the millions they're owed), and cost them millions more in duties and legal fees. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 2:56 am
Item (f) about claim charts should be left to the way the courts apply Huawei v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 9:41 am
“[R]eview is available to determine whether there has been a substantial departure from important procedural rights, a misconstruction of the governing legislation, or some like error going to the heart of the administrative determination. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
by Marty Lederman By Marty Lederman and Steve Vladeck* Section 1021 of the NDAA and the Laws of War In our companion post, we explained that section 1021 of the NDAA will not have the dramatic effects that many critics have predicted–in particular, that it will not affect the unresolved question of whether the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) would authorize a future President to place a U.S citizen or resident who is apprehended in the United States in long-term military… [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 2:17 pm
R. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 11:24 am
You're not the boss of me. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 5:11 pm
During the reprieve the case nagged at me; I couldn’t figure out how I had f*cked up so royally, and with my client sitting next to me the whole time to boot. [read post]
