Search for: "Line v. Line"
Results 8721 - 8740
of 45,530
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2020, 4:40 am
Tasin v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 5:30 am
We will be following the case of United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 9:46 am
Singer then called the police and, later that morning, identified Haley in a line up. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 5:40 pm
I understand Commissioners must always make these decisions with an eye toward what is likely to prevail in court, but perhaps the right line of inquiry is how to make economic evidence more persuasive and teach generalist judges what they need to know rather than reducing the role of economics in favor of non-economic considerations that are much more likely to mislead us about the competitive effects of a practice. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 7:21 am
The first claim of the '633 application states:An on line incentive-based method for matching job-seekers to potential employers in an internet based employment website including, maintaining a database of job-seekers with means for posting and updating resumes, maintaining a database of employers interested in accessing and viewing the job-seekers resumes, identifying the logged employer by login ID and searching the database of job-seekers that matches the job requirement criteria,… [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 10:04 am
Nantuckett Business Centre v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:04 pm
Air Lines, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 3:46 pm
The post Justice Black's Dissent in <i>Tinker v. [read post]
6 Jul 2008, 5:09 am
Finance Express LLC v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 9:02 pm
The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Trump v. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 9:03 am
See Lindsay v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 8:26 am
Given that Membership of the EU is dependent upon Member States adhering to the Convention, does the UK intend to pull out of Europe or alternatively implement the ECtHR decision in Hirst v UK(No2)? [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 9:28 am
The link to the transcript for the March 31, 2014 oral arguments before the SCOTUS in Alice Corp. v CLC Int’l can be found here. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 10:35 am
Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 12:40 pm
Bush v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 5:13 am
Background: Description amendmentsThe current EPO Guidelines for Examination require applicants to amend the description of a European patent application in line with the scope of the allowable claims (H-V, 2.7 and F-IV, 4.3(iii)). [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 5:13 am
See Whren v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 5:12 am
In Kiobel v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 6:55 am
But they seem to have a particularly hard time with off-line transactions, or those that have an off-line component. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 1:22 am
Infringement - The de minimis principle in quia timet actionsThe de minimis principle has been considered in previous patent authorities (Hoechst v BP [1998], Monsanto v Cargill [2007], Napp v Ratiopharm [2009], Lundbeck v Norpharma [2011]). [read post]
