Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 8721 - 8740
of 13,845
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Sep 2020, 11:36 am
In the third suit, in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, Northwest Immigrant Rights Project et al. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 10:23 am
Qualcomm antitrust trial here in San Diego (Southern District of California). [read post]
5 Dec 2020, 7:52 am
In fact, Apple and Intel are suing Softbank-owned Fortress Investment in the Northern District of California, and one Fortress front named Uniloc has made such procedural moves in the United States. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 7:47 am
" NIH in the 21st Century: the Director's Perspective, Testimony before the Subcommittee on Health Committee on Energy and Commerce United States House of Representatives, 17 (June 15, 2010) (Francis S. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 7:47 am
" NIH in the 21st Century: the Director's Perspective, Testimony before the Subcommittee on Health Committee on Energy and Commerce United States House of Representatives, 17 (June 15, 2010) (Francis S. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 12:15 pm
Walton v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 5:19 pm
In Regents of University of California v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 3:07 pm
River Center LLC v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 5:51 am
In this case, Southwest Key alleged a violation of the Federal Fair Housing Act; the California Fair Employment and Housing Act; the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment; and the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 5:34 pm
Even the Supreme Court has gotten in on the act with its 2011 decision in Brown v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 4:00 am
In Whren v. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 8:24 am
United States, 403 U.S. 713, this Court upheld the press’ right to publish information of great public concern obtained from documents stolen by a third party. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 8:50 am
United States, 13-7120 (ditto); Zivotofsky v. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
The SmithKline panel instead decided that Witt’s rational-basis-review approach is inconsistent with—and thus no longer binding because of—the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2007, 11:40 am
We affirm.In State of Indiana v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm
After Redd lost his appeal, the California Appellate Project filed a pro forma state habeas petition for him in order to toll the limitations period. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 10:33 am
Peruta v. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 8:38 am
United States, 19-7320, a sequel to Stokeling v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 5:01 am
Stegall (5th Cir. 1981); United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 10:54 am
District Court for the Northern District of California seeking a declaratory judgment that the Canadian court order cannot be enforced in the United States and an injunction against the enforcement of such order. [read post]
