Search for: "State of California v. United States" Results 8721 - 8740 of 13,845
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2012, 11:41 am by Shain Wasser
 However, recently Planned Parenthood has been feeling heat regarding alleged cover-ups of child sex trafficking and incest in the United States. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 1:23 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
SCHWARTZ, Defendants.09-CV-2271(JS)(GRB)     UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK     2012 U.S. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 10:45 am by Rick St. Hilaire
Attorneys representing “commercial paleontologist” Eric Prokopi filed a motion to dismiss last Friday in the case of United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 5:58 am
Even though Apple has suffered some set backs, most recently in South Korea, the victory over Samsung in the Northern District of California will spur on additional lawsuits, both in the United States and in other countries. [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 12:35 pm by Neil Rosenbaum
  Farias is consistent with the California Supreme Court’s 1993 holding in Ramirez v. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 1:08 pm by Richard Renner
Oracle Corporation Case number: 12-cv-4310 (United States District Court for the Northern District of California) Case filed: August 16, 2012 Qualifying Judgment/Order: August 27, 2012 10/02/2012 12/31/2012 2012-102 SEC v. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 12:32 pm by Jon
Supreme Court decided by 6-3 in Timmons v. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 12:24 pm by Brian A. Lebrecht
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., et al. was announced out of the United States District Court, Southern District of New York. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 12:24 pm by Brian A. Lebrecht
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., et al. was announced out of the United States District Court, Southern District of New York. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 6:44 am by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
   In reaching its conclusion, the Court of Appeals relied on the April 2011 United States Supreme Court’s landmark decision in AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
In reaching its conclusion, the Court of Appeals relied on the April 2011 United States Supreme Court’s landmark decision in AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
30 Sep 2012, 8:56 pm by Susan Brenner
                                    As to the Amazon charge, the judge found that based on the evidence presented at trial, the Government has proven beyond a reasonable doubt that (1) [Ledgard] intentionally accessed without authorization a computer belonging to Amazon, and (2) by such access, [he] obtained information from a… [read post]