Search for: "United States v. District Court"
Results 8721 - 8740
of 34,743
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2021, 4:00 am
In Sambrano v. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 8:19 am
In United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 1:25 pm
The Court examined the impact of the United States Supreme Court’s intervening decision in Omnicare, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2025, 6:08 pm
The requirement that the "invasion" be conducted by a nation-state and against the United States' "territory" supports that the Congress was using "invasion" in the military sense of the term See Ex parte Bollman, 8 U.S. (4 Cranch) 75, 131 (1807) (describing levying war against the United States as "a military enterprize . . . against any of the territories of the United States");… [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 5:32 am
Applying the maxim "ask, and thou shalt not receive," the district judge in United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2005, 10:01 am
In United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 4:12 pm
The District Court dismissed the Martinez's claims. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 1:34 pm
US District Court ex rel Talk America, No. 06-75424 (9th Cir. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 6:09 pm
Defendant then “removed” the state court case to United States District Court, a procedure available to any defendant when a cause of action “originally could have been filed in federal court. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 8:00 pm
This case is State of Georgia, et al., v. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 8:02 am
TRISTAR PRODUCTS INC – United States District Court – Middle District of Georgia – August 27th, 2019) involves a products liability claim. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 4:42 pm
In reaching its holding, the Court held that the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Daimler AG v. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 7:29 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 1:12 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 3:00 am
Here is the opinion: United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 6:04 am
Birla v. [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 7:15 am
United States, 2013 U.S. [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 10:56 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 10:40 pm
The CAFC affirmed ND Ca as to non-eligible matter under 35 USC 101: Plaintiff-appellant CyberSource Corporation (“Cyber- Source”) appeals from a decision of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
14 May 2013, 6:56 am
District Court for the Northern District of Georgia under the qui tam, or whistleblower provisions, of the False Claims Act. [read post]
