Search for: "California v. Law" Results 8741 - 8760 of 33,349
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2018, 7:49 am by Gregory J. Brod
The Ellis Act is a California law that was passed in 1985 in response to the California Supreme Court case of Nash v. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 2:59 am by Walter Olson
” [Radley Balko on Fifth Circuit ruling in Dean v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 1:00 pm by Zach ZhenHe Tan
Doe was an ATS suit filed in 2011 against Cisco, a California-based internet technology provider, for allegedly aiding and abetting the Chinese government’s arbitrary detention and torture of dissidents. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:58 am by Eric Goldman
BPI * Another Murky Opinion on Lawyers Buying Keyword Ads on Other Lawyers’ Names–In re Naert * Keyword Ad Lawsuit Isn’t Covered By California’s Anti-SLAPP Law * Confusion From Competitive Keyword Advertising? [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:22 am by Schachtman
  Selikoff arrived in Los Angeles, California, from Sydney, Australia, on the S.S. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 7:00 am by Caroline Lee
Renne Public Law Group (RPLG) presented five sessions during the week with the goal of assisting California public sector employers better serve their communities. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 6:04 am by Peter Margulies
” Finding the statute unambiguous, the judge held that DHS’s contrary reading was not entitled to deference under the leading administrative law precedent, Chevron v. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 2:42 pm
§ 2C:15-1 “divisible” without citing state decisional law, reading United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 1:04 pm by Michele Haydel Gehrke and Brian Morris
The same court reversed itself in 2017 after the California Supreme Court instructed it to reconsider Gerard I in light of subsequent legislative enactments seeking to nullify the decision and clarify existing law, Gerard v. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 2:53 am by Florian Mueller
Anne-Kristin Fricke, in her capacity as spokeswoman for the Munich I Regional Court on civil-law cases, confirmed that the court still plans to hand down decisions in, technically, ten Qualcomm v. [read post]