Search for: "In Interest of C." Results 8741 - 8760 of 42,097
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2020, 9:33 am by William Ford, Elliot Setzer
Employment Announcements (More details on the Job Board) The following are job announcements of potential interest to Lawfare readers. [read post]
4 May 2020, 7:11 am by CMS
This will be of interest to claimants and defendants alike, as well as litigation funders. [read post]
4 May 2020, 4:59 am by Russell Knight
”  750 ILCS 5/602.10(c) Cook County Court Rules insist on physical attendance at the mediation. [read post]
4 May 2020, 3:17 am by Marcia Coyle
The live audio feed is being provided to Fox News, the Associated Press, and C-Span (which will broadcast them on television, online at C-Span.org and on the C-Span Radio app.). [read post]
3 May 2020, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
The UK Human Rights Blog had a post on Coronavirus presenting a serious threat to society, legitimising the collection of public health data under Article 9:2 (g) of GDPR regulations, which allows the processing of such data if “necessary for reasons of substantial public interest” and that some of this collection will take the form of contact tracing apps. [read post]
3 May 2020, 7:19 am by Eric Goldman
Sept. 11, 2019): Google review of a lawyer isn’t defamatory: The general tenor of Fishback’s statements “charged $1500 for really nothing being done” and “[c]an’t even make an appointment until they are paid in full and up to date” reflect his subjective reaction as a client of the law firm and negate the impression that he was asserting objective facts; his review was not capable of being proved true or false because when considered as a whole and… [read post]
3 May 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
Intitulé : Konstas c. [read post]
2 May 2020, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
Four criteria are relevant in this assessment: (a) the purpose of the information request; (b) the nature of the information sought; (c) the particular role of the seeker of the information in receiving and imparting it to the public; and (d) whether the information was ready and available. [read post]
2 May 2020, 1:07 pm by Josh Blackman
[Further thoughts on the Tucker Act and Federal Question Jurisdiction] Last week I posed a question: "can a plaintiff seek compensation for an unconstitutional taking, without relying on the Tucker Act's jurisdiction–if not under the Takings Clause, perhaps under some theory of tort. [read post]
2 May 2020, 8:37 am by Bruce Zagaris
These Rues include the duty of competence under Rule 1.1., the duty of diligence under Rule 1.3, the duty of communication under Rule 1.4, the duty to protection the best interests of an organizational client under Rule 1.13, the duties of honesty and integrity under Rules 8.4(b) and (c), and the duty to withdraw under Rule 1.16(a). [read post]
2 May 2020, 8:37 am by Bruce Zagaris
These Rues include the duty of competence under Rule 1.1., the duty of diligence under Rule 1.3, the duty of communication under Rule 1.4, the duty to protection the best interests of an organizational client under Rule 1.13, the duties of honesty and integrity under Rules 8.4(b) and (c), and the duty to withdraw under Rule 1.16(a). [read post]
2 May 2020, 7:06 am by Russell Knight
” 750 ILCS 5/602.5(a) The Illinois divorce court then evaluates a series of factors to determine that best interest. [read post]
2 May 2020, 7:06 am by Russell Knight
” 750 ILCS 5/602.5(a) The Illinois divorce court then evaluates a series of factors to determine that best interest. [read post]
2 May 2020, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
" It then concluded that Sardi had violated court orders and that the presumption that joint custody was in the best interest of the child had been overcome. [read post]
1 May 2020, 7:32 am by Jordan Gold
The Harms of “Reverse Disclosure” in Sexual Assault Trials This year Parliament passed Bill C-51. [read post]
1 May 2020, 7:32 am by Jordan Gold
The Harms of “Reverse Disclosure” in Sexual Assault Trials This year Parliament passed Bill C-51. [read post]
1 May 2020, 6:47 am by lbergeson@lawbc.com
This year’s conference registration is free, so check out B&C’s poster and contact us if you are interested in learning more about TSCA TutorTM. [read post]