Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 8741 - 8760
of 13,845
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2012, 7:10 am
The Supreme Court of the United States has announced the cases it will review, and one of those is a sexual harassment case out of Indiana. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 3:20 pm
Hunter’s testimony also touched on the Board’s decision in Specialty Healthcare, which makes it easier for unions to certify “micro” bargaining units. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 12:58 pm
S.Res. 561, A resolution recognizing National Native American Heritage Month and celebrating the heritages and cultures of Native Americans and the contributions of Native Americans to the United States. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 7:08 am
In reaching its conclusion, the Court of Appeals relied on the April 2011 United States Supreme Court’s landmark decision in AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 6:08 am
In reaching its conclusion, the Court of Appeals relied on the April 2011 United States Supreme Court’s landmark decision in AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 4:24 am
Exclusive remedy is alive and well on both coasts of the United States.In New York, the state's Appellate Division, 2nd Department, ruled that an employer that violated federal immigration law by hiring two undocumented aliens did not lose its exclusive remedy protection from claims filed by those workers after they were injured at work.In New York Hospital Medical Center of Queens v. [read post]
27 Sep 2012, 6:34 pm
United States, 436 U.S. 238, 243 (1978): Several provisions of the Internal Revenue Code require third persons to collect taxes from the taxpayer. [read post]
27 Sep 2012, 4:54 pm
By Matthew Hinks In an opinion containing echoes of the United States Supreme Court's controversial and much maligned decision in Kelo v. [read post]
27 Sep 2012, 12:36 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 12:03 pm
In fact, the court highlighted both United States Supreme Court and California Supreme Court authority recognizing the policy favoring arbitration agreements. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 8:08 pm
Subsequent to the Kagenveama decision, the United States Supreme Court handed down a decision that complicated things. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 1:17 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 1:12 pm
United States, 98 Fed. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 4:44 pm
State law required Paul V. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 4:44 pm
State law required Paul V. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 1:39 pm
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 10:40 am
On September 19, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in Casias v. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 5:47 am
These two counts charged Laiwala with violating California Penal Code § 115(a), which provides as follows:Every person who knowingly procures or offers any false or forged instrument to be filed, registered, or recorded in any public office within this state, which instrument, if genuine, might be filed, registered, or recorded under any law of this state or of the United States, is guilty of a felony.People v. [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 8:52 am
In The Business Store v. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 9:59 am
In this case, even assuming that Complainant held registered marks in the United States and Canada, its apparent markets for financial services, it would have failed to make its prima facie case based on the Respondent’s rebuttal proof that it had both rights and legitimate interests in the use of the domain name. [read post]
