Search for: "State v. Congress"
Results 8741 - 8760
of 29,297
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2010, 9:00 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2009, 8:06 pm
Most prosecutors in the U.S. enjoy absolute immunity for activities in the criminal process and as advocate for the state (Imbler v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 7:08 am
Glispie v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 5:06 am
He did not disclose the inventions to anyone in the United States before he applied for United States patents. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 9:06 pm
The facts of Biestek v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 3:18 am
On May 1, 2018, the Federal Sentencing Guideline amendments were submitted to Congress. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:30 am
Thus, Congress could have abrogated state sovereign immunity with respect to those. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 6:10 am
Sorrell and LULAC v. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 1:10 pm
The second of these two cases, Windsor v. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 2:06 pm
Grumet stated that if Obama were elected, he would give Congress 18 months to pass new legislation. [read post]
19 May 2020, 7:39 am
The US Supreme Court ruled Monday in Opati v. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 6:39 am
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 9:40 pm
Nothing in Supreme Court precedent gives Congress such unlimited power (a point Kessler seems to accept), and allowing it certainly makes a hash of the text of the Commerce Clause, which merely gives Congress the power to regulate “Commerce . . . among the several States. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 4:50 am
Mary's Honor Center v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 11:02 am
They claim that the heightened standard of proof is an essential component of the patent “bargain,” see Bonito Boats, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 9:47 pm
One decision, Gill v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 10:13 am
Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior University v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 12:43 pm
Yet, in US v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 12:43 pm
Yet, in US v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 3:04 pm
Moreover, as discussed here, on May 18, 2011, the California Intermediate Court of Appeals held in the Luther v. [read post]
