Search for: "State v. Losee" Results 8741 - 8760 of 14,488
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2023, 5:31 am by Emma Svoboda
On April 19, the Supreme Court delivered a decision in Türkiye Halk Bankasi S.A. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 6:19 am by Kevin Smith, J.D.
  So I will set aside May 16, fully expecting to hear news from the long-awaited trial of Cambridge University Press v. [read post]
4 Nov 2024, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
" Assuming that's true, one would want to know whether it's a response to a shift in attitudes or mostly a litigation-avoidance strategy in response to Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 4:59 am by Ben
The maximum damages allowed under U.S. copyright law of $150,000 could potentially be awarded for each track infringed, and as Grooveshark has been accused of infringing nearly 5,000 tracks in the lawsuit - that's a massive $736 million (UMG Recording Inc et al v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
For the fairly obvious reason that in each case, the first certiorari question is whether the Court should overrule Grutter v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 2:10 pm by Lovechilde
  This means making sure those conservative Democrats running for re-election in red states understand that they will need the support of their base, and particularly Democratic women who support Roe v. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 2:23 am
The Court stated that the operators of said platform, playing an essential role in making the works available, are to be considered liable of copyright infringement. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 12:00 am
The Court stated that the operators of said platform, playing an essential role in making the works available, are to be considered liable of copyright infringement. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 1:55 am by Florian Mueller
Judge Koh issued a case management order on Wednesday evening by local time in the second Apple v. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
" It would be more accurate to state that the district abolished eight positions and then determined that Petitioners were the least senior in the tenure area of the positions abolished. [read post]