Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 8741 - 8760
of 13,840
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Sep 2012, 4:44 pm
State law required Paul V. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 4:44 pm
State law required Paul V. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 1:39 pm
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 10:40 am
On September 19, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in Casias v. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 5:47 am
These two counts charged Laiwala with violating California Penal Code § 115(a), which provides as follows:Every person who knowingly procures or offers any false or forged instrument to be filed, registered, or recorded in any public office within this state, which instrument, if genuine, might be filed, registered, or recorded under any law of this state or of the United States, is guilty of a felony.People v. [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 8:52 am
In The Business Store v. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 9:59 am
In this case, even assuming that Complainant held registered marks in the United States and Canada, its apparent markets for financial services, it would have failed to make its prima facie case based on the Respondent’s rebuttal proof that it had both rights and legitimate interests in the use of the domain name. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 8:39 am
This decision applies only to those employees who work for private companies in the United States and have a right to organize a union. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 6:51 am
In addition, an FMMO merely covers some, but not all regions of the United States. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 5:40 am
http://bit.ly/Q3mYPY (Dennis Kiker) States Enacting Rules on Use of Electronic Data in Medical Liability Cases – http://bit.ly/NztMYc (IHealthBeat) Technology Review: A FrameWork for Managing People, Technology and Processes - http://bit.ly/NrQlhv (Lynn Frances) Tips for Identifying and Preserving ESI – http://bit.ly/OXF9Xj (James Bernard, Michael Quartararo, Jason Vinokur) Twitter Contempt Sanctions Increase Need for Social Media Governance Plan… [read post]
18 Sep 2012, 3:54 pm
California - The U.S. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 9:13 pm
The inset photo is of the US Courthouse for the Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California in Oakland, California, which is home to Bankruptcy Judges Efremsky, Hammond, and Lafferty. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 2:35 pm
Maybe You Can Take it With You: Post-mortem Publicity Rights in the United States/Marilyn Monroe World Trademark Review (pdf): http://www.worldtrademarkreview.com/issues/article.ashx? [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 6:33 am
The Texas Attorney General’s announcement that the state will appeal a voter ID decision in Texas v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 11:56 am
The list I just linked to include some that were adjudicated, but both of them routinely appeal everything.The California jury cleared Apple of infringement of Samsung's five patents-in-suit. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 4:58 am
LA Fitness International: Shifting Costs to Seek Fairness in Discovery – Reed Smith – http://bit.ly/NejzAg (Patricia Antezana) Warrantless Phone Search Deemed Unconstitutional; Destroys State’s Murder Case – http://bit.ly/P5BXJW (IT-Lex) We Produced Privileged Documents; Now What? [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 3:41 am
A lengthy explanation of reasonable suspicion and suspected forged paper tags is United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 1:23 am
” Id. at 1112 (citingGon and the seminal California duty to defend case Gray v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 1:29 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 9:05 am
Plaintiffs were consumers of Cheerios who resided in California, New Jersey, and New York, seeking to sue on behalf of all similarly situated individuals in the United States. [read post]
