Search for: "Figures v. Figures" Results 8761 - 8780 of 15,525
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2013, 10:40 am
 Opposing him is Professor Stephen Davies, Sir Jack's successor as Waynflete Professor of Chemistry at the University of Oxford and a pretty legendary figure in his own right. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 6:10 am
Del Corso, BestWater (Order) and of course GSM v Samona (2016).Prof. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 12:23 pm by Eugene Volokh
First, it was surprising how little the “substantial burden” argument figured in the government’s argument. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 4:29 am
 Two differently constituted Courts of Appeal for England and Wales, within a very short period, appear to have come up with quite different approaches to how to treat an appeal in which they take issue with the trial judge's findings of fact, one case being Lumos and the other being Okotoks v Fine & Country (noted by the IPKat here). [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 12:57 pm
  This from counsel practicing in the Tenth Circuit where Caplinger v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 11:50 am by Sherry F. Colb
In Justice Samuel Alito's (SA's) opinion for the Court in Dobbs v. [read post]
9 Aug 2014, 1:19 pm by Michael Lumer
Depending on how the arguments play out, the plaintiff may have just given away a $510,000 verdict (plus legal fees that will likely be somewhere in the six figures). [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 9:44 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Sheff: buried distributive concerns: user pays means we have to figure out who is a user and what it means to pay.Is the time Allocated to Review Patent Applications Inducing Examiners to Grant Invalid Patents? [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:30 pm by Giorgio Luceri
For some copyright aficionados, the company was also the protagonist in a copyright infringement lawsuit brought by Oracle in the US, "Rimini Street Inc. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 9:48 am
The Court of Appeal for England and Wales came up with a decision that was as predictable as the fact that the trial judge's ruling was going to be appealed in Starbucks (HK) Ltd & Another v British Sky Broadcasting Group Plc & Others [2013] EWCA Civ 1465. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 9:46 am by Rebecca Tushnet
What’s the relevance of the economist v. legal scholars? [read post]