Search for: "Legall v. State" Results 8761 - 8780 of 88,747
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2014, 10:31 am
The plaintiff “must show in what manner he can amend his complaint and how that amendment will change the legal effect of his pleading. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 7:41 am by Dan Farber
With turnout possibly boosted by the overruling of Roe v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 12:25 pm
I've only had a chance to read the SCt's opinion in DA's Office v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 4:18 am by Timothy P. Flynn
So it was yesterday at the High Court in Washington, D.C. for argument in the case of United States v Texas, posing an important immigration policy question that tests the very limits of executive branch power.This case presented an evenly divided Court -down one justice following Justice Scalia's sudden death in February- with the task of passing muster on President Obama's innovative immigration policy; a series of recent executive directives made through the Department… [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 12:31 am by Lawrence Solum
  In that context, the baseline problem is strongly associated with Cass Sunstein, and especially with his analysis of the United States Supreme Court's decision in Lochner v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 5:30 am by Joy
SCC to Decide R v BykovetsGeorgia Judge Will Release Parts of Report on Trump Election InquiryVancouver police officer guilty of assault with weapon in arrest of Black man stopped for jaywalkingLooking for love on Valentine’s Day? [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 11:41 am by Gene Quinn
On May 20, 2013, the United States Supreme Court granted cert. in Medtronic v. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 10:01 am by Stephanie Sundier
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit on Tuesday ordered an en banc rehearing of DC and Maryland v. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 12:35 pm by lennyesq
By Lisa Armstrong *** In October, 2014, Prisoners’ Legal Services of New York reached a settlement with the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision (doccs) in Cookehorne v. [read post]