Search for: "People v. Powers" Results 8761 - 8780 of 15,377
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2024, 9:05 pm by Kyle Bradley
Second, Knudsen contends that the Court in Robertson v. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
A key concept under the rule of law is that similarly situated people should be treated similarly. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 1:18 pm by Witzke Berry PLLC
Your Durable Power of Attorney For most people, the durable power of attorney is the most important estate planning instrument available--even more useful than a will. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 10:25 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Predictable v. unpredictable. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 7:30 am by Tessa Shepperson
The only people other than solicitors who can bring claims are litigants in person, and people who hold power of attorney for claimants – so long as the power of attorney authorises this. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Arguing for the federal government in the case of United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 11:30 am by Will Baude
People in positions of power and privilege now thought it "dangerous" to insist on enforcing the Constitution too much. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 11:50 am by David Debold
By untethering the definition of that term from traditional exercises of governmental power, the lower-court decisions in McDonnell v. [read post]
3 Mar 2025, 1:40 pm by Sarah Grace Spurgin
The report spotlights select ISDS cases, including the egregious example of von Pezold v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 3:55 am
It also confirmed that similar packaging increases people’s likelihood of buying the product.That’s the nub. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
The Court's decision in Loving v Virginia says nothing to the contrary regarding original understanding. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 3:52 am by Kellie McTammany
These documents are significant for non-married LGBTQIA+ people in a seriously committed relationship. [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
  The Law Society Gazette had a piece on the case: “People who live in glass houses shouldn’t make article 8 claims”. [read post]