Search for: "United States v. May"
Results 8761 - 8780
of 47,752
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2009, 7:59 am
In the first seven days of this month, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reversed two lower court rulings in favor of employee-plaintiffs. [read post]
16 Dec 2007, 10:58 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 8:41 pm
On February 2, 2012, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia decided 3m Co. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 5:40 am
In Malack v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 5:57 am
In her majority opinion, Justice Elena Kagan held that administrative law judges are officers of the United States, not employees, and so they have to be appointed under the Constitution’s appointments clause. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 9:28 am
United States, 2020 WL 398625 (D.C. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 3:44 pm
” As a practical matter, it simply means that a lawyer may practice law on a limited basis in a state in which he or she is not licensed. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 3:59 am
Grieving alleged out-of-title work assignmentsBailey v GOER, 259 AD2d 940Sometimes a Taylor Law contract will include a provision barring unit members from being assigned to perform “out-of-title” work. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 4:36 pm
On Friday, June 28, 2024, the United States Supreme Court overturned the Chevron doctrine in Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 10:15 am
In Crawford v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
United States v Meng, 2020 BCSC 785 [82] Ms. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 7:20 am
United States Steel Corp., No. 12–417. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 5:26 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 6:41 am
” (Cite to Dart v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 8:27 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 11:36 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 7:14 pm
Each plaintiff had legally worked in the United States for six or more years. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 1:02 pm
For example, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Martinez v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 2:46 pm
The issue: On May 16, 2008, Genetics sued Novartis in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware to determine priority of invention under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 10:42 am
Today the Chamber judgment of the ECHR came down in the case of Babar Ahmad and Others v. [read post]
