Search for: "C. Hamilton" Results 861 - 880 of 1,283
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2012, 1:01 am by William Carleton
Thanks again are due Jim Hamilton, who reported last week this had occured. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 5:24 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Attorneys meet with judge and want to make state responders a third-party to suicide case (a/c of delayed 911 response time).David approaches Diane and asks for what Julius is requesting -- Will's office, letterhead, etc., states he's the better choice because he will revert to former position when Will returns. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 2:41 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) So held the Hawaii Supreme Court, in Hamilton ex rel. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 1:19 pm by WIMS
Feb 1: The House Energy and Commerce (E&C) Subcommittee on Environment and the Economy, chaired by Rep. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 6:30 am by William Carleton
As I mentioned yesterday, Jim Hamilton's blog provides a good overview of the NASAA proposal. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 2:44 am by Legal Beagle
The move brings the Lord President into line with the wishes of the Scottish Government, who fell over themselves to castigate the UK’s Supreme Court and even it’s Scottish judges after rulings in the Cadder v HMA case and Nat Fraser appeal.The Lord President’s representations to Westminster can be read online HERENow that the Lord President has ‘rolled over’ to make a judicial request to back up the harsh words from Scottish Ministers, who did not enjoy the impression… [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 7:34 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
Christianne Kapps: I wish there was a way to force banks to keep foreclosed homes on their balance sheets until they ACTUALLY sell the houses, thereby making banks: a) more willing to re-fi instead of rushing to foreclose; b) reduce or slowdown growing inventories; c) keep property tax paying homeowners in their homes, increasing states taxbase and keeping schools properly funded, stabilizing neighborhoods, and propping up client credit ratings, rather than destroying them. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:48 pm by Steve Vladeck
By Marty Lederman and Steve Vladeck* [Cross-posted at OpinioJuris] Section 1021 of the NDAA and the Laws of War In our companion post, we explained that section 1021 of the NDAA will not have the dramatic effects that many critics have predicted–in particular, that it will not affect the unresolved question of whether the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) would authorize a future President to place a U.S citizen or resident who is apprehended in the United States in… [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm by Marty Lederman
by Marty Lederman By Marty Lederman and Steve Vladeck* Section 1021 of the NDAA and the Laws of War In our companion post, we explained that section 1021 of the NDAA will not have the dramatic effects that many critics have predicted–in particular, that it will not affect the unresolved question of whether the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) would authorize a future President to place a U.S citizen or resident who is apprehended in the United States in long-term military… [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 2:30 pm
I was reminded of a piece I read not long ago in which a professional in expert marketing - Rosalie Hamilton, the Expert's Expert on Marketing, http://www.expertcommunications.com/, said - (Excerpt) If you are concerned about how you will look when answering questions about marketing your expert services, remember that the attorney grilling you is probably listed in local, state, and national bar association publications; Martindale-Hubbell(c) attorney directory; local,… [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:16 am by Eugene Volokh
., 418 U.S. 323, 340 (1974), and “[c]alculated falsehood falls into that class of utterances” which are categorically unprotected, Garrison v. [read post]