Search for: "Cole v State" Results 861 - 880 of 1,122
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2020, 8:38 am by John Elwood
United States, 19-7320, a sequel to Stokeling v. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 4:20 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
These facts are sufficient to state a claim for promissory estoppel.* Multimedia Patent Trust v. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 3:01 am by Jeremy Saland
” Again, while I may disagree that merely stating that one attempted to leave a store is sufficient, the greater legal concept remains. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:55 pm by The Editors
Court of Appeals Second Circuit’s rehearing of Arar v. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 8:48 am by Robichaud
The threat posed by the latter is unique because “when equipped with sophisticated surveillance technologies, the state may be tempted to embark on forward-looking, ‘fishing expedition[s] in the hope of uncovering evidence of crime. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 12:45 pm
While federal district court decisions are not binding on state courts or on the Ninth Circuit, the growing acceptance of the reasoning in White v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 8:17 am
Well, Bulgaria is in the EU and an EUTM can be blocked from registration by a national mark from any EU Member State. [read post]