Search for: "Davis v. United States"
Results 861 - 880
of 3,061
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2021, 11:29 am
United States (2020) and Pen America v. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 9:01 pm
Cir. 1973). 5 United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
Anthony List v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 3:51 am
United States Postal Service, the court held 6-3 that the government is not a “person” who can challenge the validity of a patent under the America Invents Act. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 5:57 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 4:48 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 9:44 am
Throughout their time in the United States, Respondent has ensured that AC kept in contact with her father. [read post]
9 May 2018, 4:09 pm
In March, in United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 9:01 pm
United States or Printz v. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 9:02 am
Arguing on behalf of the United States as amicus curiae in support of Davis, Assistant to the Solicitor General Benjamin Snyder did not seem to fare much better—with the very first question after his opening coming from Kavanaugh (followed shortly thereafter by a question from Gorsuch). [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 8:01 am
John Elwood at the Volokh Conspiracy points us to certpool.com, a website that tracks certiorari petitions in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 12:21 pm
As the United States Supreme Court observed in Harris v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 3:45 am
United States, a unanimous court held that a trial court can consider mandatory minimums for possessing firearms when sentencing a defendant for an underlying drug offense. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 9:23 am
In United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 11:48 am
(Tamar Davis Larsen, et al. v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 1:34 pm
The case is United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 6:07 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 7:56 am
In Davis v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 3:45 pm
See United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 6:43 am
While Mason’s resentencing was pending, the United States Supreme Court decided Hurst v. [read post]
