Search for: "Doe 35" Results 861 - 880 of 17,228
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2011, 6:07 pm by Mark Terry
The Examiner issued a 35 U.S.C. 103 obviousness rejection of the product-by-process claim based on a prior art reference that disclosed the chemical composition, but did NOT disclose the Applicant's process. [read post]
17 Dec 2022, 11:02 am by Russell Knight
When the child support payor’s employer does not forward the deducted child support, the child support recipient has many avenues to enforce child support payments and punish the uncooperative employer. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 6:22 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Section 10(1) IHTA provides that a disposition that “was not intended, and was not made in a transaction intended, to confer any gratuitous benefit on any person” is not a “transfer of value” and so does not give rise to a charge to inheritance tax. [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 9:06 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
That presumption does not control in cases . . . [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 3:38 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
§ 251, we do not reach the question of whether therecapture rule applies and, if it does, whether it wasviolated here.The CAFC went into some basics:Typically, if an applicant files a patent applicationdisclosing and claiming one invention and later realizesthat the specification discloses a second or broader invention,he may seek coverage of those additional claimspursuant to 35 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 7:16 am by Gritsforbreakfast
A study in Washington state found that inmates released directly from the Supermax prison, which consists entirely of solitary confinement, committed new felonies at a rate 35 percent greater than that for inmates of the same risk profile released from the general population.Additionally, a greater percentage of the new crimes committed by those released from solitary confinement were among the most serious violent felonies. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 7:56 am by Jaclene D'Agostino
(see Matter of Neenan, 35 AD3d 475, 476 [2d Dept 2006]; Matter of Bartel, 214 AD2d 476 [1st Dept 1995]). [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 5:33 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Patents, Inc., 64 F.3d at 1557-58, 35 USPQ2d at 1804-05. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 10:09 am by Westminster Law Library
As criminal law grows, so does the West Key Number SystemNew Key Numbers for Criminal Law (topic 110)Criminal law has seen many changes in the last few years, particularly in areas such as the application of Miranda, the exclusionary rule, and the admissibility of the defendant's prior misconduct.West's response: As of August 1, more than 400,000 headnotes have been reclassified in the West Key Number System, particularly within Criminal Law (topic 110) and Arrest (topic… [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 1:18 pm by Dennis Crouch
  The false marking statute –  35 USC 292 –  sets a maximum fine but does not set a minimum. [read post]
6 May 2023, 8:03 am by Joel A. Webber
But there’s a problem: Legal does not always work-and-play-well-with-others in the enterprise. [read post]