Search for: "Downs v. State of California"
Results 861 - 880
of 6,448
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2023, 7:50 am
NRDC v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am
What this case may come down to is what the phrase “lawfully made under this title” in §109(a) actually means. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 4:32 pm
If that were not enough, the Supreme Court’s companion decision, Hollingsworth v Perry, No. 12-144, decided June 26, 2013, leaves in place a determination, under California state law, that same-sex partners could not be denied the benefits of marriage. [read post]
27 May 2009, 1:39 pm
Virginia in 1967, striking down state bans on marriage of men and women of different races; Romer v. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm
Indeed, in Gratz v. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 1:23 pm
Having taken the time to read through the Respondent’s brief in the Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 1:58 pm
Likely in response to the California Supreme Court’s December 23, 2016 ruling in Augustus v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 4:38 am
California. [read post]
20 Apr 2008, 2:50 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 12:30 pm
On Wednesday, April 27, 2011, the United States Supreme Court decided AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 6:28 pm
California, 384 US 757 (1966). [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 6:23 am
A California Superior Court’s recent ruling in Murphy v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 3:01 am
Becerra (challenge to California law requiring “crisis pregnancy centers” to convey state-prescribed messages), Lozman v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
Susan Illston, Judge, United States District Court, Northern District of California Aton Arbisser, Kaye Scholer LLP Elizabeth J. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 8:22 pm
v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 6:15 am
Other coverage continued to focus on some of the other amicus briefs filed in Hollingsworth and United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 5:00 am
Contreras v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 5:00 pm
Justice Scalia’s concurring opinion in California v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 8:37 am
Royalty Alliance, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 12:26 am
Those are the three dozen states (one of which--the District of Columbia--is a state for all practical intents and purposes here, though formally it doesn't enjoy statehood) suing Google in parallel case, minus California, which filed a separate brief (next bullet point). [read post]
