Search for: "Gary v. State" Results 861 - 880 of 1,992
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2015, 7:34 am by Patrick S. O'Donnell
The book came out before the Supreme Court’s ruling in Shelby County v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
In Alfred v Safir, 283 AD2d 280, the disciplinary penalty to be imposed agreed upon by the employee and employer’s representative was made part of the record by the disciplinary hearing officer.New York City Police Commissioner Howard Safir, suspended Gary Alfred for 30 days without pay and placed him on disciplinary probation for one year following the "settlement of disciplinary charges" filed against Alfred. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 3:19 pm
This year, one state enacted major new restrictions, while several states removed restrictions. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 5:52 am
  Here, “the Commonwealth” basically refers to the prosecution, as in “State v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 3:02 am by Burton A. Padove
Indiana, as in most states, seeks equitable distribution, or a distribution that is fair given the circumstances. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 11:07 am
  Today we tee up the latest state appellate court win – David v. [read post]
27 May 2015, 3:18 pm
  Related Issues: Computer Fraud And Abuse Act ReformRelated Cases: Rubin v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 9:00 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Committee for a Better Arvin v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 1:58 pm by Stephen Bilkis
95 N.Y.2d 368 740 N.E.2d 1075 718 N.Y.S.2d 1 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent-Appellant, v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:29 am by Tim Sitzmann
In the Board’s 2012 decision of Research in Motion Ltd. v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:45 am by Amy Howe
The Court also asked the Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the views of the United States in Nebraska v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 12:40 pm by Daily Record Staff
In a case where appellant contends that the trial court erred by denying his motion to correct his sentence, appellant failed to allege an inherent illegality in his sentence. [read post]