Search for: "German v. German"
Results 861 - 880
of 5,196
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2023, 7:51 am
A spokeswoman for the Munich I Regional Court has confirmed that a Nokia v. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 10:37 pm
What does matter here is that the Chinese decision may help Huawei in the UK, and a German court has no business interfering with that--even if the interference is not an antisuit injunction against the Chinese case but just a finding that weighs against Huawei's defenses in the German case.It's a fact that defendants to German cases (SEP and non-SEP cases alike) often turned to UK courts for invalidity determinations just to have persuasive authority in place… [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 2:00 am
Because of my pro-copyright positions in connection with Oracle v. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 11:47 am
Kufner v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 1:42 am
Yesterday, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) rendered a landmark decision in Oracle v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 7:03 am
The anti-retaliation provision of the Dodd-Frank Act does not extend beyond U.S. soil, a federal district court in New York ruled, dismissing the retaliation claims of a China-based compliance officer for a German corporation’s Chinese subsidiary (Liu v Siemens, A.G., October 21, 2013, Pauley, W, III). [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 1:49 pm
Zumbiel v. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 9:52 pm
The author of the stories is accordingly free to write further novels without input by his now former friend; nor was the cartoonist entitled to damages in respect of "Wilde Kerle" films IV and V which were created without his involvement as a director, nor were his cartoons used in the making of those movies. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 3:20 am
"We do not believe that there is any basis for this claim against Schroders filed in the U.S. courts," a spokesman said, Dow Jones reported.The case is Blackrock Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 11:43 am
Still, though this rule may not crop up often, if at all, in a family law case, it is still a rule and understanding it may help an attorney whose client is undergoing some form of physical or mental evaluation to be familiar with the Court’s holding in Shearer v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 11:43 am
Still, though this rule may not crop up often, if at all, in a family law case, it is still a rule and understanding it may help an attorney whose client is undergoing some form of physical or mental evaluation to be familiar with the Court’s holding in Shearer v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 12:49 am
OPPO/OPPO v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 8:38 am
In a dispute between Apple and the DPMA (the German Patent and Trademark Office) relating to the registrability of Apple’s device trade mark depicting its flagship store design, the German Federal Patent Court had referred the below questions to the CJEU for a preliminary ruling. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 8:14 am
The outcome of Illumina v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 11:59 pm
County of Hawaii v. [read post]
17 May 2020, 2:57 am
Alan also kindly shared with the IPKat readers an English translation of this German judgment. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 7:29 am
” Robert v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 12:00 am
The Court referred to the case Stjerna v. [read post]
29 Sep 2018, 12:24 am
Smartphone Purchasers v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 5:53 am
In this post I described the Mannheim situation as a stuttering steamroller, and in October the Munich court threw out another case because it didn't identify an infringement.But several more German Qualcomm v. [read post]
