Search for: "German v. United States"
Results 861 - 880
of 1,997
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2011, 12:00 pm
See Tang, slip op. at 7-9.Still, some enterprising lawyers tried to make that litigation the latest Chinese export to the United States. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 1:48 pm
(ZDNet - A Developer's View) CLIPARAMA.com launches world's biggest video only search (Philip Brooks' Patent Infringement Updates) Details released on the Radiohead experiment results: a tremendous success (Techdirt) Disney EULA funny, but also a bit sad (Innovationpartners) Canada Canada Election 2008 - a digital policy scorecard (Michael Geist) Europe European Court of Justice rules database owners can prevent material from being transferred from their… [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 12:38 pm
See, e.g., McClain v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 8:54 am
Khaled El-Masri's illegal rendition, detention and torture will continue to haunt the United States until the right thing is done and justice is served at home, not just abroad. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 11:03 am
After the men returned to the United States, Campbell sued Muller and Muller’s insurance company in Oklahoma court. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 8:36 pm
Following this transitional period, the Brussels Ibis Regulation and all EU instruments in their area of law will no longer apply to the United Kingdom. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:35 am
Animal rights organisation People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) has taken legal action in the United States on the monkey’s behalf (apparently named Naruto), claiming that the animal owns the copyright in the successful photographs and should therefore reap the benefits financially. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 9:07 am
v=1673018415 [read post]
25 May 2018, 4:00 am
Those with draft bills include France, Ireland, Spain and the United Kingdom. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 11:01 am
District Court for the District of Columbia’s ruling in United States of America v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 1:00 pm
Although the Court dismissed the argument that sitagliptin should nevertheless be regarded as being “protected” by the basic patent because it embodies the “core inventive advance” of that patent, it did acknowledge that a corresponding approach is followed in the United Kingdom (and other EU member states), resulting in a divergent practice across the European Union. [read post]
18 Sep 2010, 9:49 am
“I’ve now had a chance to read a little more closely the decision, majority and concurrence, in Kiobel v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 12:52 am
Garske (United States)III.C Views of Law and the Cities· The Interaction between Non-Judicial Mechanisms of Conflict Resolution and the State: the Case Study of Maputo, Concetta Tina Lorizzo, University of Cape Town (South Africa)· Plurality and the City, Julian Sidoli del Ceno, Birmingham City University (United… [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 8:39 am
The civil law suit, Beaty v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:32 am
United States and Schenck v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 9:27 am
The move is a radical departure from the policy of the Obama administration and also of numerous European allies of the United States, and comes as Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said yesterday that Assad’s fate “will be decided by the Syrian people. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 11:00 pm
The English High Court has recently rendered an insightful and thought provoking decision on the application of Art. 4 II and III of the Rome II Regulation (Winrow v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 8:00 pm
USA as World Patent Court: In Voda v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 8:00 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
10 Jan 2009, 11:43 am
Pham, Enforcing Foreign Arbitral Awards in the United States: The Non-Arbitrable Subject Matter DefenseHenri C. [read post]
