Search for: "Hale v. Hale"
Results 861 - 880
of 1,333
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2018, 1:00 am
The proposed panel for hand down is Lady Hale, Lord Hodge and Lord Kitchen. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 12:02 am
Today in Courtroom 2 is In the matter of LC (Children) (Nos. 1 and 2), to be heard by L Hale, L Wilson, L Sumption, L Toulson and L Hodge. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 3:15 am
Starting on Wednesday in Courtroom 2 of the Supreme Court is the two day hearing of In the matter of Peacock, which will be heard by Lady Hale and Lords Hope, Walker, Brown and Wilson. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 1:00 am
The proposed panel for hand down is Lady Hale, Lord Reed and Lord Kerr. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 1:00 am
The proposed panel for hand down is Lady Hale, Lord Reed, and Lord Hodge. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 2:45 am
Starting on Wednesday in Courtroom 2 of the Supreme Court is the two day hearing of In the matter of Peacock, which will be heard by Lady Hale and Lords Hope, Walker, Brown and Wilson. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 1:00 am
The proposed panel for hand down is Lady Hale, Lord Hodge and Lord Lloyd-Jones. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 1:16 am
The appeal was heard on Monday 3 and Tuesday 4 November 2014 by Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Sumption, Lord Carnwath and Lord Hodge. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 1:00 am
Lord Mance (with whom Lady Hale agreed) gave a more administrative-based focus in a separate judgment. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 5:17 am
This judgment triggered some further recriminations despite the fact that Lady Hale, Lord Wilson, Lord Carnwath, Lord Hughes and Lord Hodge unanimously dismissed Mirza, Iqbal and Ehsan’s appeals. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 6:46 am
The Supreme Court Lady Hale and Lords Mance, Hughes, Hodge, Lloyd-Jones unanimously dismissed the Government’s appeal. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 4:15 am
In relation to the first issue, Lord Reed in his judgment (with which Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Sumption and Lord Hodge agreed) noted that the decisions taken under rule 45(2) in these two cases were not taken by the Secretary of State, but instead by a senior prison officer or “operational manager”. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
See Appellant’s Br., Norman v. [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 11:27 am
In Hale v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 5:32 am
Baroness Hale was particularly forceful in her exposition of the rationale underpinning the offence: it is there to protect underage children from sexual predation, whether they appear to want it or not. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm
The panel will be Lord Neuberger Lady Hale, Lord Clarke Lord Wilson and Lord Toulson. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 8:15 am
McIntyre Machinery Ltd. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 6:55 am
“Sundholm v. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 11:34 am
Yusupov v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 4:36 pm
In the Court’s view this distinguished the case from Baroness Hale’s example of Naomi Campbell popping out to the shops to buy a carton of milk. [read post]
