Search for: "IN RE THE RULES OF CONTINUING LEGAL"
Results 861 - 880
of 15,733
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2016, 2:56 pm
In this case, the trial court should have ruled that California had jurisdiction to rule on the father’s petition. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 2:56 pm
In this case, the trial court should have ruled that California had jurisdiction to rule on the father’s petition. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 6:37 pm
The court stated In re David J. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 5:00 am
” The Rule: DNA-Sample Collection from Immigration Detainees (.PDF) Continue reading [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 12:27 pm
Multiple lawsuits have been filed challenging the legality of the salary increase rule, including three lawsuits filed in Texas federal courts. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 7:48 am
— If you’re going stir-crazy hunkered down at home, consider these great ideas. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 10:06 am
It’s unclear whether this ruling changes things and will spur a similar settlement. __ Eric’s Comments: In addition to the legally vexing issue of kids making Internet purchases, there are a couple of oddities about this opinion. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 5:48 am
Seeking the maximum consensus under “rule by law” is the guarantee that China’s reform will continue forward, and is also the place where the well-being of all the people resides. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:49 pm
have committed a breach of legal ethics by leaking material to the N&O. [read post]
1 Apr 2023, 7:43 pm
” In re WeWork Litig., C.A. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 9:46 am
Some of the responses to lack of access to justice rely on lawyers (or paralegals) and others are based on the assumption that lawyers are either not required, they’re required just a little bit or can be replaced by non-legally trained advisers (I mean “replaced” here, rather than supplemented or partnered with) or not by people at all, but by, in effect, machines. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 5:02 pm
While the court ruled that an out of state psych was okay, as was the change being measured from initial commitment hearing as opposed to revocation. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 1:13 pm
Now is an opportune time for companies to re-examine their commitment to these things and establish or continue best measures for union avoidance. [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:47 am
There are lawyers who will not refer matters to a large firm because they’re afraid that they’ll refer the matter and lose the client,” he said. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 3:03 pm
And should notions of policy and fairness determine how courts decide legal issues like tolling? [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 6:28 am
In light of the San Bernardino attack and threats of future attacks, the U.S. has re-emphasized self-defense. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
The doctrine of collateral estoppel bars the relitigation of a legal or factual issue that was previously decidedWashington v NYC Department of Education, USCA, 2nd Circuit, 17-3776-cvIn Grieve v Tamerin, 269 F.3d 149, the Circuit Court of Appeals said that the doctrine of collateral estoppel, also termed issue preclusion, bars re-litigation of a legal or factual issue that was previously decided where: (1) the issues in both proceedings are identical,(2) the issue in the… [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 9:48 am
By John Stigi, John Tishler, and Edwin Astudillo In In re Ancestry.com Inc. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 6:38 am
On March 29, 2018, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit issued its ruling in In re: Petition of Frescati Shipping Co., Ltd., as Owner of the M/T ATHOS I, Nos. 16-3552, 16-3867 & 16-3868 (3d Cir. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 6:38 am
On March 29, 2018, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit issued its ruling in In re: Petition of Frescati Shipping Co., Ltd., as Owner of the M/T ATHOS I, Nos. 16-3552, 16-3867 & 16-3868 (3d Cir. [read post]
