Search for: "INTERNATIONAL CUSTOM PRODUCTS V US" Results 861 - 880 of 2,190
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2017, 8:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Classify them as those internal to the grant, based on its very structure (originality, fixation); prerequisites for enforcement for right (substantial similarity); defenses or exceptions (first sale, fair use). [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 3:41 pm
Part 2 | It may be use, but is it trade mark use? [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:59 am by INFORRM
Despite all this Datalink continued, according to the Supreme Court judgment, to carry on business from an unknown location, selling its impugned product on its websites to customers all over the world. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 2:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
That may well be “commercial speech” — speech promoting one’s own products or services to potential customers — and thus less constitutionally protected; the restrictions were upheld on those grounds by federal trial courts in Briggs & Stratton Corp. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 9:51 am by Staff Writer
  In 1994, RICO charges were successfully brought up against pro-life activists in NOW v. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 8:47 am by Ryan P. Phair
” However, these disclosures need not be made on the initial offering page for a product. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am by Graham Smith
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (28 June 2017). [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am by Graham Smith
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (28 June 2017). [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 3:50 am by Kevin LaCroix
 Market forecaster Gartner expects 6.4 billion connected devices will surround us in the home and workplace this year, a $30 billion market by the year 2020. [read post]