Search for: "In the Matter of Amendments to Rules 1 and 10" Results 861 - 880 of 5,483
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2011, 8:06 am by WSLL
Summary of Decision November 10, 2011[SPECIAL NOTE: This opinion uses the "Universal Citation. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 3:14 pm by John Jascob
She also expects the SEC to act on credit risk retention rules, Regulation SCI and other market structure issues. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
” [10] The EPO furthermore published a Notice dated 11 December 1992 (Supplement No. 2 to OJ EPO 12/1992, p. 3) which was intended to supplement the decisions of the Administrative Council and the President of the EPO and to clarify the new rules and the EPC and PCT procedures. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 2:16 am by Neil Wilkof
The rule in Art. 4(1)(e) of the Directive, to be transposed into national law, was already known and its enactment was only a matter of time. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 11:09 am by Tobin Admin
§ 38-3-62, during the period of this Order, the undersigned hereby suspends, tolls, extends, and otherwise grants relief from any deadlines or other time schedules or filing requirements imposed by otherwise applicable statutes, rules, regulations, or court orders, whether in civil or criminal cases or administrative matters, including, but not limited to any: (1) statute of limitation… That language clearly tolled the running of the statute of limitation in… [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 7:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Citing McCormick, Evidence §173 [6th ed] [supp], the Appellate Division observed that “most courts do not apply the exclusionary rule to various administrative proceedings including employee disciplinary matters”. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 3:33 am by Broc Romanek
Executive pay & related-party disclosures (this is the “biggie” on pages 5-6; rethinking the 2006 rule amendments) 2. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 3:03 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
”  Reaching for a clear rule to object to conduct, because clear rule following is part of the justice framework. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 10:46 am by Antonin I. Pribetic
If it is subsequently amended, even to the point of cancelling the meeting altogether, this does not infringe on the appellant in any meaningful way. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The same applies to the interpretation of the Implementing Regulations on the Grant of European Patents and the Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal, as they are part of the EPC (A 164(1)) or have their basis in the Implementing Regulations (R 12(3)). [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 8:53 am by Sarah Grant
But Sundel, acting general counsel for the Military Commissions Defense Organization, intervened to say that Baker was invoking privilege pursuant to Rule 501(b)(1) and refusing to testify. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 1:33 pm by Francis Pileggi
By contrast, the instant decision in the NuVasive matter applied a new California law, that was enacted after the Ascension case was decided, now known as Section 925 of the amended California Labor Code. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 5:58 am by Bernard Bell
Patel’s Fourth Amendment analysis.[1] The aspect of the opinion that merits discussion in this post is the NMFS’s treatment of the claim that the tracking rule violated the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am by Michelle
Because of that fatigue, merchants secured several concessions regarding card acceptance rules, in addition to the fee reduction. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 5:21 am by Don Cruse
The Texas Supreme Court has now amended the trial and appellate rules of procedure (PDF) to conform to that statute. [read post]
3 May 2019, 6:39 am by Marino Sveinson
The government also distributed a news release regarding the changes that these proposed amendments would bring including: permiting “lawful consumer leafleting” when picketing (s. 1); requiring an independent review of the Labour Relations Code every five years (s. 2); permitting a person “to communicate to an employee a statement of fact or opinion reasonably held with respect to the employer’s business” (s. 4); which previously was, “a person… [read post]