Search for: "J. C." Results 861 - 880 of 19,468
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
With an Array of Tactics, Conservatives Seek to Oust Progressive Prosecutors Yahoo News – J. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 8:22 am by Marcel Pemsel
It was undisputed that Jägermeister’s trade marks enjoy a reputation in the EU in accordance with Art. 9(1)(c) EUTMR, especially among young party people. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 2:34 pm by Giles Peaker
His counsel told the Judge that only “one point” of defence was being pursued; namely, that: (a) the deposit had not been protected; (b) in consequence, the prescribed information about deposit protection had not been provided; and (c) the deposit “has not effectively been returned to the defendant”. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 11:47 am by Bryan West
This raises the question of what the limits of that deference are, and whether there is any basis to apply this reasoning to a determination of an adjudicator appointed under construction legislation.[1]Such as that provided under Part 5 of the Prompt Payment and Construction Lien Act, RSA 2000 c P-26.4 the “PPCLA”, or Part II.1 of the Construction Act, RSO 1990 c C.30 Arad Incorporated v. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 8:40 am by CMS
Mr Justice Jay agreed with the Lower Court that Canada Square’s breach of duty was deliberate for the period between ss 140A-C CCA 1974 coming into force on 6 April 2007 and the end of the loan in March 2010. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 5:43 am by Tim Zinnecker
  Please send application materials to Professor Michael J. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 3:00 am by Will Baude
Michael Stokes Paulsen and I have a new draft article: The Sweep and Force of Section Three, that is forthcoming in the Pennsylvania Law Review. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 5:31 am by Daniel Shaviro
 In an article in today's Tax Notes (here, but it's behind a paywall), DC tax lawyers Donald Susswein, Kyle Brown, and J. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
On July 12, 2023, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) voted 3 to 2 (Commissioners Peirce and Uyeda dissenting) to adopt certain amendments to rules and forms under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “Investment Company Act”) intended to improve the resilience and transparency of money market funds (“MMFs”). [read post]