Search for: "Jason v. State"
Results 861 - 880
of 1,745
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
The state and its instrumentalities tend to be risk averse--the essence of the ideology of compliance based governmentality. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 8:45 am
Co. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 9:40 am
See Barrett v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 4:52 am
"Here, said the Appellate Division, the fire incident report stated that the fire originated "in combustible roofing material on the roof of the first-floor rear setback and that the cause of the fire was the reckless use of an open flame.... [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 10:39 am
Young, and Jason T. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 3:05 am
.United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 10:11 am
The Connecticut opinion, Noffsinger v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 7:22 am
As I read the dissents I kept thinking about the 1954 decision in Brown v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 1:04 am
The complaint alleges that the scheme culminated after Ira and Todd returned from jail when, following unfruitful negotiations for a buyout of Meryl’s shares valued by Ira around $2.3 million, Ira and Jodi sent Jason a notice of termination of his employment and simultaneously sent Meryl a notice stating that, under Section 4 of the shareholders’ agreement, Jason’s termination triggered Meryl’s obligation to sell her shares back to… [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 6:52 am
And discussing the decision at Balkinization, Jason Mazzone observes that the Court’s general approach to state court decisions “is to ignore all but the biggest errors. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 5:25 pm
GOMBERT, PAUL JASON GOMBERT, TAMMY D. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 2:24 am
The Panopticon blog has a post about the decision in W, X, Y and Z v Secretary of State for Health, Secretary of State for the Home Department and British Medical Association [2015] EWCA Civ 1034 concerning the sharing of medical information. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm
United States The United States District Court for the Northern District of California issued its decision to grant the Center for Countering Digital Hate’s (CCDH) motion to strike out under an anti-SLAPP statute in the case of X CCDH. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 9:14 am
The Washington Post reports that the Court’s decision in Skilling v. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 2:08 pm
When the Supreme Court decided Roger Coleman's case (Coleman v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:05 am
On 15 December 2023, as stated above, Fancourt J handed down judgement in favour of the claimants in the case of The Duke of Sussex and Ors v MGN Limited [2023] EWHC 3217 (Ch). [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 1:00 am
R (HC) v Secretary of State for Works and Pensions & Ors, heard 21-22 Jun 2017. [read post]
28 Oct 2024, 6:00 am
In Smith v. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 1:00 am
R (HC) v Secretary of State for Works and Pensions & Ors, heard 21-22 Jun 2017. [read post]
