Search for: "Johnson v. Administrator" Results 861 - 880 of 1,927
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2016, 7:57 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which the Court ruled that its 2015 decision in Johnson v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Johnson was not entitled to a statement of the reason for the termination of her probationary employment, citing York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760.Accordingly, said the court, Supreme Court properly granted the appointing authority’s motion to dismiss Johnson’s petition.* See, for example, 4 NYCRR 4.5(b) of the Rules of the State Civil Service Commission. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 3:04 am by Amy Howe
United States, holding that the Court’s 2015 decision in Johnson v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 3:27 am by Amy Howe
Empirical SCOTUS; Kevin Johnson, who at Immigration Prof Blog concludes that “the Obama administration may come out okay in United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 1:42 pm by Molly Runkle
United States, holding that its decision in Johnson v. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 3:30 pm by Ad Law Defense
** How can we “Know It When We See It” to divine when the FTC will label an all natural claim misleading? [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 12:20 pm
 The Administration has placed high priority on mitigating and combating the theft of trade secrets, as exemplified in the Administration’s Joint Strategic Plan on Intellectual Property Enforcement, the Administration’s Strategy on Mitigating the Theft of U.S. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 10:11 am by John Elwood
  After efforts (of disputed exhaustiveness) to receive an administrative remedy to the denial of a permit failed, Arrigoni turned to federal court for a Section 1983 inverse takings claim. [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 8:36 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 41087, March 2, 2016) and dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies a Native American inmate's complaint that authorities seized his medicine bag and the refused to allow him to retrieve religious objects when he was transferred.In Hoever v. [read post]