Search for: "Mark v. Wish"
Results 861 - 880
of 2,180
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2017, 1:16 am
Does Mr Justice Arnold's decision in Teva v MSD show just how large a role patent law has come to play in assessing SPC validity? [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 11:08 am
That case, Ruiz v. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 1:35 pm
See Medicines Co. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 1:55 am
”)Welcome clarification on the Malaysian law of well-known marks; but there is still judicial work to be doneThe law of well-known marks continues to develop apace in various countries in Asia – Kat Neil Wilkof invites his friend NG Kim Poh to offer a summary of an important decision in Malaysia on this dynamic topic (in Y-Teq Auto Parts (M) Sdn Bhd v X1R Global Holdings & Anor (CACA NO. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 9:12 am
In this post, I wish to discuss its broader policy implications. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 4:37 am
” You wouldn’t get this out of Mark Joseph Stern’s post at Slate. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 9:08 am
One example: Maker’s Mark case v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 9:01 pm
They have fervently wished to be able to persist in their “mission” work while marginalizing LGBTQ families and children. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 9:01 pm
They have fervently wished to be able to persist in their “mission” work while marginalizing LGBTQ families and children. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 1:05 am
Millions of millennia ago, in our own Milky Way galaxy, but far upstream of where we are today, two neutron stars spiraled around each other, each embodying the mass of a sun but smaller and faster than a speeding planet. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 2:03 am
Document D1 was therefore comprised in the state of the art according to Article 54(3) EPC.The opposition division further held that claim 1 of the first and second auxiliary requests filed during the oral proceedings before the opposition division on 7 December 2010 did not contain subject-matter which extended beyond the content of the application as filed (Article 100(c) EPC in combination with Article 123(2) EPC), but that the subject-matter of said claims did not involve an inventive step with… [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm
Sheales represented trainers Mark Kavanagh and Danny O’Brien whose cobalt charges have been dismissed on appeal in the Victorian and Civil Administrative Tribunal. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 2:04 pm
Attorneys who wish to visit their clients at Camp VII must have higher-level security clearances than those required to visit Camp VI. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 11:45 pm
| Corks popping following account of profits decision | "Kit Kat" finger shape marks: this time in Singapore | Two events in March | MIP International Patent Forum 2017 | More Than Just a Game - 2017 edition | INTA comes to Barcelona in May for its Annual Meeting (early bird registration, but not for long)Never Too Late 137 [week ending on Sunday 26 February] | Patents and the Silicon Valley of clothespins | Interested in EU copyright and wish to discuss it in Florence? [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 7:04 am
In FCC v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 9:01 am
Novation Ventures, LLC v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 9:30 pm
” Of these decisions, one—Hughes v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 1:59 am
For instance, a Single Judge of the Delhi High Court in Bloomberg Finance LP v. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 3:12 am
"Kit Kat" finger shape marks: this time in Singapore The Singapore Court of Appeal in Societe Des Produits Nestlé SA and anor v Petra Foods Limited and anor [2016] SGCA 64 recently affirmed a previous High Court decision that Nestlé’s two-finger and four-finger shape marks (the “Shape Marks”) are not registrable. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 3:10 am
For more information or if you wish to attend, please contact Dr Eleonora Rosati: e.rosati@soton.ac.uk7. [read post]
