Search for: "Means v. Wilson" Results 861 - 880 of 1,617
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2011, 5:41 am
Certification of the payroll critical to lawfully paying an individual in the classified serviceEldridge v Carmel Cent. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 2:25 pm by Giles Peaker
Akerman-Livingstone v Aster Communities Ltd [2015] UKSC 15 When the Court of Appeal held that a disability discrimination defence to possession under Equality Act 2010 had to face the same ‘seriously arguable’ summary test as an Article 8 defence, we were surprised, and very unimpressed. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
Ralph Wilson Plastics Co., 509 N.W.2d 520, 523 (Mich. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
Wilson… A remand for selection of which allied offense the State wishes to have the defendant sentenced on does not permit the trial court to grant a motion to vacate the guilty plea, the 3rd District reaffirms in State v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am by INFORRM
In a judgement of 26 July 2022, Nicklin J held that the defamatory meaning was that the Claimant was a hypocrite who had screwed the country and set a poor moral example to young people ([2022] EWHC 2469 (QB)). [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 8:24 am by Adam Wagner
This means that there must be a court hearing, which is likely to be expensive, and therefore restricts a poorer party’s access to justice. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 6:15 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Corcoran and Pritchard v Van Nes. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
But different people have different self-defense needs, and they should be able to choose other means of defending themselves, as well—especially when those means are much less deadly than guns, as is the case for stun guns (electric weapons that require the user to touch the target with the weapon) and Tasers (electric weapons that shoot a probe that delivers the electric shock). [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 11:07 pm
The test was devised by Justice Stewart in United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 10:59 am by Hakemi
Punnett's Reason for Judgment in Wilson v. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 4:44 am by Jeff Gamso
(We can hope that the Court will at least loosen that rule when it decides Pottawattamie County v. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 2:23 pm by James H. Wilson, Jr.
No, a lump sum monetary award is properly enforced as a money judgment and not through the show cause process in Virginia, as explained in Brown v. [read post]