Search for: "Natural Resources Defense CouncilĀ " Results 861 - 880 of 2,137
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2018, 5:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The world of directors’ and officers’ liability is always dynamic, but 2017 was a particularly eventful year in the D&O liability arena. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm by The Regulatory Review
The Regulatory Review is pleased to highlight our top fifty regulatory essays of 2017 authored by outside contributors. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm by The Regulatory Review
The Regulatory Review is pleased to highlight our top fifty regulatory essays of 2017 authored by outside contributors. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 8:48 am by Rebecca Gantt
Natural Resources Defense Council, a 1984 Supreme Court case that is widely considered a foundational case in administrative law, courts interpreting an ambiguous provision of a federal statute defer to an agency’s interpretation of that statute. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 2:43 am by NCC Staff
South Carolina Coastal Council (1992), which said that the denial of all economic use of a property by a government regulation was a taking under the Fifth Amendment and required just compensation. [read post]
16 Dec 2017, 8:50 am
It spends more on national defense than China, Saudi Arabia, Russia, United Kingdom, India, France, and Japan combined.US health care expenditures per capita are double the OECD average and much higher than in all other countries. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 4:16 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  Given the nature and scope of these new requirements, most covered plans will require specific action be taken before the new rules take effect to update plan documents, summary plan descriptions, notices, contracts, processes and procedures to meet the January 1, 2018 deadline. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 6:06 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
.): 2017.12.06 – Bears Ears Complaint (filed) Here is the complaint in Natural Resources Defense Council v. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 9:30 pm by Sarah Madigan
The Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) condemned the action; NRDC president Rhea Suh called it “unprecedented” and “illegal. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 9:30 pm by Justin S. Daniel
Natural Resources Defense Council—provides that when litigants challenge agency decisions in court, judges must “defer to an agency’s interpretation of a statute the agency administers” whenever the law at issue is “ambiguous” and “the agency’s interpretation of the statutory ambiguity is reasonable. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 11:23 am by Theresa Gabaldon
Natural Resource Defense Council, Inc., if congressional intent is unclear, courts should defer to an agency’s permissible construction of the relevant statute. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 5:25 am by Jon Gelman
Because of the threat that Dourson represents to public health and to any meaningful implementation of the 2016 TSCA agreement, Congress must act to make sure asbestos, a chemical everyone knows is dangerous, is taken off the market once and for all.Specifically, today’s legislation would:Amend TSCA to require the EPA to identify and assess known uses of, and exposures to all forms of asbestos.Require that, within 18 months of enactment, the EPA must impose restrictions on the use of asbestos… [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 12:45 pm
The Natural Resources Defense Council has filed many suits challenging Trump’s effort to rescind environment-friendly regulations and rules on clean water, clean air, and climate change. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 5:20 pm by Aurora Barnes
Natural Resources Defense Council when the only ambiguity is a direct conflict between two statutory sections, which the agency has not addressed; and (2) whether the Immigration and Nationality Act’s asylum provision affords a noncitizen in reinstatement proceedings the opportunity to seek asylum in the United States. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 2:04 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Failure to receive a written notice or failure to acknowledge in writing the receipt of a written notice shall not be a defense to a subsequent charge of a violation of R.S. 39:3-40. [read post]