Search for: "People v Lord"
Results 861 - 880
of 1,806
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2014, 4:30 am
Evidence Act) were legislated into hurried existence in the late 1960’s, in response to the decision in, Myers v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:00 am
This reluctance has been captured by an admonition credited to Lord Denning about the importance of a judge not conducting the examination of witnesses because “he, so to speak, descends into the arena and is liable to have his vision clouded by the dust of conflict …” (Lord Denning was quoting Lord Greene MR, in Yuill v Yuill [1945] P 15, 20.) [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 4:17 pm
Clause 4 is a ‘reasonable publication’ defence not a ‘responsible publication’ defence reflecting the latest common law as outlined by Lord Brown in Flood v Times. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 2:59 pm
Did he come up with the ‘bright idea’ of appointing Chris Grayling as Lord Chancellor after his evening out? [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 9:38 am
The landlord can give a counter-notice disputing the RTM company’s entitlement: s.84 (various other people also can, but in reality it is landlords who do this). [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 9:38 am
The landlord can give a counter-notice disputing the RTM company’s entitlement: s.84 (various other people also can, but in reality it is landlords who do this). [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 4:05 pm
On Tuesday 17 December 2013, the Court Martial Appeal Court (Lord Chief Justice, Tugendhat and Holroyde JJ) will give judgment in the case of R v Marines A to E. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 8:41 am
Further, in NDMC v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 7:59 am
Furthermore, in a 2011 judgment on an immigration case from the Supreme Court, ZH (Tanzania) v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 7:59 am
Furthermore, in a 2011 judgment on an immigration case from the Supreme Court, ZH (Tanzania) v. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am
If it is found that the third parties in this case were negligent then the respondent will be liable under its non-delegable duty of care to the appellant. [1] Brown v Nelson & Ors [1971] LGR 20 [2] Gold v Essex County Council [1942] 2 KB 293, 301 [3] Cassidy v Ministry of Health [1951] 2 KB 343 [4] A (Child) v Ministry of Defence [2005] QB 183, 47 per Lord Phillips of Worth [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am
If it is found that the third parties in this case were negligent then the respondent will be liable under its non-delegable duty of care to the appellant. [1] Brown v Nelson & Ors [1971] LGR 20 [2] Gold v Essex County Council [1942] 2 KB 293, 301 [3] Cassidy v Ministry of Health [1951] 2 KB 343 [4] A (Child) v Ministry of Defence [2005] QB 183, 47 per Lord Phillips of Worth [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 7:10 am
The IPKat has reported a few times on the attention-riveting case of Resolution v Lundbeck. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 9:48 am
The Court of Appeal for England and Wales came up with a decision that was as predictable as the fact that the trial judge's ruling was going to be appealed in Starbucks (HK) Ltd & Another v British Sky Broadcasting Group Plc & Others [2013] EWCA Civ 1465. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 2:06 am
But today Lord Justice Leveson says people would be ‘alarmed’ by him. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 3:13 pm
Chandler v. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 12:16 pm
Janis Joplin sang, “Lord, won’t you buy me a Mercedes Benz”; the law rightly did not require her to sing, “Lord, won’t you buy me a generic expensive car” instead. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 7:38 am
A has been seen by other people who know her ex-partner and has been moved out of Lambeth to another refuge in the adjoining borough of Southwark. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 7:38 am
A has been seen by other people who know her ex-partner and has been moved out of Lambeth to another refuge in the adjoining borough of Southwark. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 8:40 am
In Freedom Bound, it is law that provides the means for instituting empire and its circumscriptions of legal and civic personality, from the beginnings of Spanish and English colonization of the Americas to Dred Scott v. [read post]
