Search for: "People v. Richards" Results 861 - 880 of 3,645
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
See the several books concerning such methods and management written by, Richard and Daniel Susskind, plus the other authorities, all set out in the “further suggested reading&rd [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 4:25 am
We defend people charged with unspeakable crimes. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
  We had a post on the first instance decision in which damages of £30,000 were awarded to Richard Burgon MP against the Sun. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
   If most of the people I write about are extremists, then postwar movement conservatism -- and perhaps conservatism per se -- are extremist. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 3:22 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  What we’re doing in © is important but what’s more important is the right to copy and talk.Commentary by Richard Stallman, Free Software FoundationDefaults are tremendously important. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 4:26 pm by INFORRM
On the same day, Richard Spearman QC (sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge) handed down judgment in the case of Otuo v The Watchtower Bible and Tract Society[2019] EWHC 1349 (QB) (heard 1-14 and 25 to 29 March and 1 April 2019). [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 7:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  But I continue to believe that the 1968 and 1992 elections, to mention only two especially significant post-World War II elections (and not, for example, the 1912 or 1860 elections), present their own problems inasmuch as the two winners, Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, had the demonstrated support of only 43% of the population, and, of course, were faced as well by a “divided” Congress in which at least one house was controlled by the opposition party. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
 There were, to be sure, some gadflies, such as Richard Epstein at the University of Chicago who denounced the New Deal in root and branch, as well as Gary Lawson and Randy Barnett, all of whom conveyed a distinctly libertarian sensibility. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 4:32 am by INFORRM
The judgment follows the precedent set in Richard v BBC, that individuals investigated by law enforcement bodies have a reasonable expectation of privacy as a matter of general principle. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm by Evan Caminker
And if he is subpoenaed to testify before Congress, a strong argument can be made that he can, and should, say more.A 2000 DOJ Opinion, on which I worked while I was a deputy in the Office of Legal Counsel, reaffirmed a Watergate-era DOJ determination that criminally prosecuting a sitting President would violate the constitutional principle of separation of powers, even after the Supreme Court decided in Clinton v. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 4:47 am by Hon. Richard G. Kopf
Prelude: After a night at the bars, a man wakes in a room with a psychopath Richard G. [read post]
21 May 2019, 3:56 am by Lyle Denniston
In that ruling, the Court said that Congress lacked the general power to inquire into people’s private lives. [read post]
19 May 2019, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
Jacob Rowbottom and Richard Wingfield. [read post]