Search for: "Phillips v. Phillips"
Results 861 - 880
of 4,220
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2017, 8:00 am
Madden v. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 11:18 am
Supreme Court is set to hear the case of Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 6:11 am
However, the decisions in Fort Myers v. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 8:32 am
” At the Pacific Legal Foundation’s Liberty Blog, Jonathan Wood discusses the foundation’s amicus brief in Christie v. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 12:55 am
Keyes, special counsel at the firm, write: In Continental Casualty Co. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 7:36 am
The Supreme Court has consistently supported the use of arbitration agreements in employment, and explicitly upheld employment-related class and collective waivers in its 2018 decision in Epic Systems Corp. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 9:22 am
The Supreme Court heard oral argument yesterday in CITGO Asphalt Refining Co. v. [read post]
24 May 2015, 3:22 pm
The criminal defendant, Phillip Johnson, is charged with Endangering the Welfare of a Child, Penal Law ["PL"] 260.10(1). [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 11:39 am
In Brinkley v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 7:54 am
Therein, Wheeler asserted co-authorship of four books with Marc Shell, who really is a professor at Harvard.And, as to IP-->“Prospero’s Maps: Cartography, Location, and Invention in The Tempest”***FlashbackRecall episode 12 of "Mad Men", titled Nixon v. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 9:19 am
The one case citation I left in, above, is Cohen v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 8:45 am
The landmark 1994 case Farmer v. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 6:32 pm
The case, 303 Creative v. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 5:06 am
. a deceit that reaches the level of egregious conduct” on the part of Phillips Lytle LLP (Savitt v Greenberg Traurig, LLP, 126 AD3d 506, 507 [1st Dept 2015] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Englert v Schaffer, 61 AD3d 1362, 1363 [4th Dept 2009]; cf. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 9:46 am
It is however an established principle of Strasbourg jurisprudence that such a right does not extend so far as to impose a positive obligation on public authorities to disclose or distribute information (see Leander v Sweden (1987) 9 EHRR 433 or Roche v United Kingdom (2005) 42 EHRR 599). [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 10:45 am
See Kaneka Corp. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 6:12 am
In its recent decision in the case of Phillips v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 6:54 pm
” Phillips v. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 3:30 am
Unified Patents Inc. explained in its amicus brief in Cuozzo Speed v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 4:00 am
In the recent Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) decision in R. v. [read post]
