Search for: "Price v. Superior Court"
Results 861 - 880
of 1,080
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2012, 12:02 am
” In that case (Superior Consulting) the employer conducted business in 43 states and several foreign countries, which supported the court's conclusion that the noncompetition agreement's unlimited geographical scope to be reasonable. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 8:01 am
The Ontario Superior Court ultimately agreed. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 5:32 pm
Barras, 2007 CA 001600 B (DC Superior Ct Feb. 1, 2008). [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 9:54 am
Austin v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 8:15 am
Arizona v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 8:02 pm
I make no claim of impartiality, since I am helping to make many of the same arguments in the pending lawsuit over the Diocese of San Joaquin in the California Superior Court, in Fresno County. [read post]
22 Dec 2024, 9:05 pm
Palm Beach Fire Fighter’ Pension Fund v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 12:35 pm
Lee, Garcia v. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 12:05 pm
Co. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm
First, the Superior Court of Justice (STJ)—the highest appellate court in Brazil for non-constitutional matters—stated last year in State of Rio de Janeiro v. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 5:09 pm
Superior Court (1997) 15 Cal.4th 232, 237 [62 Cal.Rptr.2d 243, 933 P.2d 507].) [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 6:00 am
[Nielsen] paid no part of the purchase price and has paid no rent. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 10:35 am
See Allergan Inc. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 10:52 am
Mattel argued that the list of examples in the contract were illustrative not exclusive, but the Court held that "ideas" are "markedly different from the list of examples including discoveries, improvements and designs" (People ex rel Lungren v superior Court (1996)). [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 3:06 am
Unlike many legal commentators that have criticized the European Courts, we conclude that the approach of the Courts is justified both from a purely legal standpoint and from a Law and Economics perspective. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm
French argued that the governing case here is the Supreme Court case Employment Division v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 1:46 pm
As an initial matter, the ALJ rejected Petitioner’s assertion that trademark settlement agreements are not subject to antitrust scrutiny in light of FTC v. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 12:22 pm
When those conditions are satisfied, NYNEX's holding (which is consistent with much of the Supreme Court's general jurisprudence about the monopolist's freedom to optimal pricing, e.g., Trinko, Linkline) that deceptive or fraudulent conduct that merely results in higher prices but not exclusion cannot be the basis of a Section 2 claim. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
(IP Dragon) Copycats in China: trains, planes and ... automobiles (IP Dragon) Denmark Copenhagen Maritime and Commercial Court rules Innocent Pictures ApS’ use of ‘Tivoli’ and ‘Tivoli Night’ in context of pornographic broadcasts infringes trade mark rights of Danish amusement park TIVOLI A/S (Class 46) Court finds minimal confusion in MINIMAL case (International Law Office) Europe ECJ: Promotional items do not… [read post]
4 Sep 2010, 4:30 am
More to the point, as the Supreme Court clarified in KP Permanent Make-Up, Inc. v. [read post]
