Search for: "Re v. PERS" Results 861 - 880 of 7,384
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2014, 6:31 am by Howard Wasserman
Nugent, in which the Court GVR'd to the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of last week's per curiam reversal without full briefing (also of the Fifth Circuit) in Tolan v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 1:49 pm by Bexis
  First, he passes along a new medical device preemption decision, Bishoff v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 6:39 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
  The FSIS claims that the amendment is necessary to achieve compliance with the Supreme Court’s decision in IBP, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 7:52 am
  The Court’s decision leaves 13 undecided cases from the 2008-2009 term including In re Servaas and Henry v. [read post]
15 Mar 2009, 5:08 pm
  But hedge fund manager John Paulson and the Haas   family shareholders will in essence re-invest their proceeds from the sale for preferred stock in Dow. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 2:58 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
The Supreme Court, in its 5-4 decision today in Shelby v. [read post]
19 Apr 2006, 9:12 am
This is especially true when you talk about the cost to processing e-discovery, with prices as high as $2,000 per GB. [read post]
1 May 2009, 7:29 am
v=1 Per the Yahoo News I read the article and not sure what to believe. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 10:57 am
Although it is not a case that breaks new ground, today's per curiam opinion in Autozone, Inc. v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 12:20 pm by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
It’s important to note, as per Illinois choice of law rules, that the pre-suit demand requirement is governed by the law of Delaware in the case of corporations incorporated there (Wells v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 3:30 am by INFORRM
In Re: W (A child) [2016] EWCA Civ 1140 the Court of Appeal considered a case in which a Family Court judgment was severely critical of two witnesses and the applicant local authority. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 9:35 am by Andres
The European Court of Justice has finally ruled on the landmark case of L’Oréal v eBay (C-324/09) . [read post]