Search for: "Roberts v. King" Results 861 - 880 of 1,270
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2020, 1:02 pm by Brian M. Wright
In King County, current data shows that 16.8% of positive cases require hospitalization. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 11:21 pm by Frank Cranmer
On Tuesday 4 June, the Chair of the UK Statistics Authority, Sir Robert Chote, wrote to leaders of political parties to ask that their parties and candidates use statistics appropriately and transparently. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 4:30 am by Donna Ballman
Find out by reading Robert Fitzpatrick's A Sham or Just Self-Serving? [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:36 pm by Sandy Levinson
  I would strongly hope that a truly honest dissent would begin as follows: "Roe v. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 7:22 pm by Smita Ghosh
Also in the NYRB, Gerard Russell reviews three books on the recent political movements in the Middle East by Jean-Pierre Filiu,Thanassis Cambanis and Robert F. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
(Patent Circle) India: ‘In transit’ drug seizures and TRIPS: UK decision may help Indian companies (Spicy IP) India: Public interest litigation to prevent GM seeds in India (IP Osgoode) Isle of Man: SPCs on the Isle of Man (The SPC Blog) US: Board decision in Ex Parte Roberts doesn’t make the cut (Patents4Life) US: Are you getting all the patent term you should? [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 3:06 am by Scott Bomboy
Justice Robert Jackson, who had replaced Stone on the bench, systematically disassembled Frankfurter’s reasoning in his majority decision in West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
King, 260 U.S. 174, 176 (1922) (noting that precedent had long “settled that it is within the police power of a state to provide for compulsory vaccination”); Jacobson v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 2:41 pm by James R. Copland
Indeed, before her last year's service as Solicitor General, her most prominent litigation effort was probably having signed onto a wrongheaded amicus brief in Rumsfeld v. [read post]